From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slub: skip node in case there is no slab to acquire
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:17:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181113131751.GC16182@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181108011204.9491-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
On Thu 08-11-18 09:12:04, Wei Yang wrote:
> for_each_zone_zonelist() iterates the zonelist one by one, which means
> it will iterate on zones on the same node. While get_partial_node()
> checks available slab on node base instead of zone.
>
> This patch skip a node in case get_partial_node() fails to acquire slab
> on that node.
If this is an optimization then it should be accompanied by some
numbers.
> @@ -1882,6 +1882,9 @@ static void *get_any_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags,
> enum zone_type high_zoneidx = gfp_zone(flags);
> void *object;
> unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;
> + nodemask_t nmask = node_states[N_MEMORY];
This will allocate a large bitmask on the stack and that is no-go for
something that might be called from a potentially deep call stack
already. Also are you sure that the micro-optimization offsets the
copying overhead?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-13 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-08 1:12 Wei Yang
2018-11-09 20:48 ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-09 23:47 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-13 9:12 ` [PATCH v2] " Wei Yang
2018-11-13 13:17 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-11-13 13:26 ` [PATCH] " Wei Yang
2018-11-13 13:34 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-20 3:31 ` [PATCH v2] mm/slub: improve performance by skipping checked node in get_any_partial() Wei Yang
2018-11-22 3:05 ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-22 9:13 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-22 23:41 ` Wei Yang
2018-11-23 13:39 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-23 13:49 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-23 15:27 ` Wei Yang
2018-12-20 22:41 ` Andrew Morton
2018-12-21 0:25 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-12-21 3:29 ` Wei Yang
2018-12-21 1:37 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-12-21 1:37 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-12-21 3:33 ` Wei Yang
2018-12-24 22:03 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181113131751.GC16182@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox