From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-f199.google.com (mail-pf1-f199.google.com [209.85.210.199]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956AC6B026A for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 01:13:45 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pf1-f199.google.com with SMTP id a26-v6so7049393pfo.17 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:13:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org. [2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d66-v6si17700752pfc.92.2018.11.11.22.13.44 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:13:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:13:37 -0800 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] mm: reference totalram_pages and managed_pages once per function Message-ID: <20181112061337.GG21824@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <1542002869-16704-1-git-send-email-arunks@codeaurora.org> <1542002869-16704-2-git-send-email-arunks@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1542002869-16704-2-git-send-email-arunks@codeaurora.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Arun KS Cc: keescook@chromium.org, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru, minchan@kernel.org, getarunks@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org, vbabka@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, vatsa@codeaurora.org On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 11:37:46AM +0530, Arun KS wrote: > +++ b/arch/um/kernel/mem.c > @@ -51,8 +51,7 @@ void __init mem_init(void) > > /* this will put all low memory onto the freelists */ > memblock_free_all(); > - max_low_pfn = totalram_pages; > - max_pfn = totalram_pages; > + max_pfn = max_low_pfn = totalram_pages; We don't normally do "a = b = c". How about: max_low_pfn = totalram_pages; - max_pfn = totalram_pages; + max_pfn = max_low_pfn; > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c > @@ -434,9 +434,10 @@ static ssize_t microcode_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, > size_t len, loff_t *ppos) > { > ssize_t ret = -EINVAL; > + unsigned long totalram_pgs = totalram_pages; Can't we use a better variable name here? Even nr_pages would look better to me. > +++ b/drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c > + unsigned long totalram_pgs = totalram_pages; Ditto > +++ b/fs/file_table.c > + unsigned long totalram_pgs = totalram_pages; ... throughout, I guess.