Re: [PATCH] memblock: remove stale #else and the code it protects

[Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>]

Which tree it applies?

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 08:03:45PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>During removal of HAVE_MEMBLOCK definition, the #else clause of the
>
>	#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
>		...
>	#else
>		...
>	#endif
>
>conditional was not removed.
>
>Remove it now.
>
>Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>Reported-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
>Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>---
> include/linux/memblock.h | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
>index d3bc270..d4d0e01 100644
>--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
>+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
>@@ -597,11 +597,6 @@ static inline void early_memtest(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
> {
> }
> #endif
>-#else
>-static inline phys_addr_t memblock_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align)
>-{
>-	return 0;
>-}
> 
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> 
>-- 
>2.7.4

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me