linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] mm/gup: Cache dev_pagemap while pinning pages
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 14:00:20 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181012110020.pu5oanl6tnz4mibr@kshutemo-mobl1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4gGqhGpR8g-HmNzoEnMAysO5uAO+8njeAokHq2CT9x71A@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 04:24:02PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 11:00 AM Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Getting pages from ZONE_DEVICE memory needs to check the backing device's
> > live-ness, which is tracked in the device's dev_pagemap metadata. This
> > metadata is stored in a radix tree and looking it up adds measurable
> > software overhead.
> >
> > This patch avoids repeating this relatively costly operation when
> > dev_pagemap is used by caching the last dev_pagemap while getting user
> > pages. The gup_benchmark kernel self test reports this reduces time to
> > get user pages to as low as 1/3 of the previous time.
> >
> > Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
> 
> Other than the 2 comments below, this looks good to me:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

Looks good to me too:

Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>

> 
> [..]
> > diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> > index 1abc8b4afff6..d2700dff6f66 100644
> > --- a/mm/gup.c
> > +++ b/mm/gup.c
> [..]
> > @@ -431,7 +430,22 @@ struct page *follow_page_mask(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >                 return no_page_table(vma, flags);
> >         }
> >
> > -       return follow_p4d_mask(vma, address, pgd, flags, page_mask);
> > +       return follow_p4d_mask(vma, address, pgd, flags, ctx);
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct page *follow_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> > +                        unsigned int foll_flags)
> > +{
> > +       struct page *page;
> > +       struct follow_page_context ctx = {
> > +               .pgmap = NULL,
> > +               .page_mask = 0,
> > +       };
> 
> You don't need to init all members. It is defined that if you init at
> least one member then all non initialized members are set to zero, so
> you should be able to do " = { 0 }".
> 
> > +
> > +       page = follow_page_mask(vma, address, foll_flags, &ctx);
> > +       if (ctx.pgmap)
> > +               put_dev_pagemap(ctx.pgmap);
> > +       return page;
> >  }
> >
> >  static int get_gate_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
> > @@ -659,9 +673,9 @@ static long __get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
> >                 unsigned int gup_flags, struct page **pages,
> >                 struct vm_area_struct **vmas, int *nonblocking)
> >  {
> > -       long i = 0;
> > -       unsigned int page_mask;
> > +       long ret = 0, i = 0;
> >         struct vm_area_struct *vma = NULL;
> > +       struct follow_page_context ctx = {};
> 
> Does this have defined behavior? I would feel better with " = { 0 }"
> to be explicit.

Well, it's not allowed by the standart, but GCC allows this.
You can see a warning with -pedantic.

We use empty-list initializers a lot in the kernel:
$ git grep 'struct .*= {};' | wc -l
997

It should be fine.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-12 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-11 17:55 Keith Busch
2018-10-11 23:24 ` Dan Williams
2018-10-12 11:00   ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2018-10-12 16:58     ` Dan Williams
2018-10-12 16:58       ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181012110020.pu5oanl6tnz4mibr@kshutemo-mobl1 \
    --to=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox