linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>,
	Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>,
	Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>,
	Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>,
	jonathan.zhang@cavium.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/18] arm64: KVM/mm: Move SEA handling behind a single 'claim' interface
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 12:02:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181012100212.GA580@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180921221705.6478-8-james.morse@arm.com>

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 11:16:54PM +0100, James Morse wrote:
> To split up APEIs in_nmi() path, we need the nmi-like callers to always
> be in_nmi(). Add a helper to do the work and claim the notification.
> 
> When KVM or the arch code takes an exception that might be a RAS
> notification, it asks the APEI firmware-first code whether it wants
> to claim the exception. We can then go on to see if (a future)
> kernel-first mechanism wants to claim the notification, before
> falling through to the existing default behaviour.
> 
> The NOTIFY_SEA code was merged before we had multiple, possibly
> interacting, NMI-like notifications and the need to consider kernel
> first in the future. Make the 'claiming' behaviour explicit.
> 
> As we're restructuring the APEI code to allow multiple NMI-like
> notifications, any notification that might interrupt interrupts-masked
> code must always be wrapped in nmi_enter()/nmi_exit(). This allows APEI
> to use in_nmi() to use the right fixmap entries.
> 
> We mask SError over this window to prevent an asynchronous RAS error
> arriving and tripping 'nmi_enter()'s BUG_ON(in_nmi()).
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>

...

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> index ed46dc188b22..a9b8bba014b5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> @@ -28,8 +28,10 @@
>  #include <linux/smp.h>
>  #include <linux/serial_core.h>
>  
> +#include <acpi/ghes.h>
>  #include <asm/cputype.h>
>  #include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
> +#include <asm/daifflags.h>
>  #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>  #include <asm/smp_plat.h>
>  
> @@ -257,3 +259,30 @@ pgprot_t __acpi_get_mem_attribute(phys_addr_t addr)
>  		return __pgprot(PROT_NORMAL_NC);
>  	return __pgprot(PROT_DEVICE_nGnRnE);
>  }
> +
> +/*
> + * Claim Synchronous External Aborts as a firmware first notification.
> + *
> + * Used by KVM and the arch do_sea handler.
> + * @regs may be NULL when called from process context.
> + */
> +int apei_claim_sea(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	int err = -ENOENT;
> +	unsigned long current_flags = arch_local_save_flags();
> +
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA))
> +		return err;

I don't know what side effects arch_local_save_flags() has on ARM but if
we return here, it looks to me like useless work.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-12 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-21 22:16 [PATCH v6 00/18] APEI in_nmi() rework James Morse
2018-09-21 22:16 ` [PATCH v6 01/18] ACPI / APEI: Move the estatus queue code up, and under its own ifdef James Morse
2018-09-21 22:16 ` [PATCH v6 02/18] ACPI / APEI: Generalise the estatus queue's add/remove and notify code James Morse
2018-09-21 22:16 ` [PATCH v6 03/18] ACPI / APEI: don't wait to serialise with oops messages when panic()ing James Morse
2018-09-21 22:16 ` [PATCH v6 04/18] ACPI / APEI: Switch NOTIFY_SEA to use the estatus queue James Morse
2018-09-28 17:04   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-21 22:16 ` [PATCH v6 05/18] ACPI / APEI: Make estatus queue a Kconfig symbol James Morse
2018-10-01 17:59   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-03 17:50     ` James Morse
2018-10-04 17:34       ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-12 17:17         ` James Morse
2018-10-12 18:10           ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-21 22:16 ` [PATCH v6 06/18] KVM: arm/arm64: Add kvm_ras.h to collect kvm specific RAS plumbing James Morse
2018-10-12  9:57   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-12 17:18     ` James Morse
2018-09-21 22:16 ` [PATCH v6 07/18] arm64: KVM/mm: Move SEA handling behind a single 'claim' interface James Morse
2018-10-12 10:02   ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2018-10-12 17:18     ` James Morse
2018-09-21 22:16 ` [PATCH v6 08/18] ACPI / APEI: Move locking to the notification helper James Morse
2018-10-12 11:08   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-21 22:16 ` [PATCH v6 09/18] ACPI / APEI: Let the notification helper specify the fixmap slot James Morse
2018-10-12 11:14   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-21 22:16 ` [PATCH v6 10/18] ACPI / APEI: preparatory split of ghes->estatus James Morse
2018-10-12 16:37   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-21 22:16 ` [PATCH v6 11/18] ACPI / APEI: Remove silent flag from ghes_read_estatus() James Morse
2018-10-12 16:55   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-21 22:16 ` [PATCH v6 12/18] ACPI / APEI: Don't store CPER records physical address in struct ghes James Morse
2018-09-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v6 13/18] ACPI / APEI: Don't update struct ghes' flags in read/clear estatus James Morse
2018-10-12 17:14   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v6 14/18] ACPI / APEI: Split ghes_read_estatus() to read CPER length James Morse
2018-10-12 17:25   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v6 15/18] ACPI / APEI: Only use queued estatus entry during _in_nmi_notify_one() James Morse
2018-10-12 17:34   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v6 16/18] ACPI / APEI: Split fixmap pages for arm64 NMI-like notifications James Morse
2018-09-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v6 17/18] mm/memory-failure: increase queued recovery work's priority James Morse
2018-10-15 16:49   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-16  7:43     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v6 18/18] arm64: acpi: Make apei_claim_sea() synchronise with APEI's irq work James Morse
2018-09-25 12:45 ` [PATCH v6 00/18] APEI in_nmi() rework Borislav Petkov
2018-10-03 17:50   ` James Morse
2018-10-04 15:15     ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181012100212.GA580@zn.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=gengdongjiu@huawei.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jonathan.zhang@cavium.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tbaicar@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox