From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7F76B0006 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 06:54:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id 88-v6so7751115wrp.21 for ; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 03:54:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de. [5.9.137.197]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 33-v6si3947446wrp.167.2018.10.04.03.54.50 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Oct 2018 03:54:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:54:43 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: x86/mm: Found insecure W+X mapping at address (ptrval)/0xc00a0000 Message-ID: <20181004105443.GH1864@zn.tnic> References: <0922cc1b-ed51-06e9-df81-57fd5aa8e7de@molgen.mpg.de> <20181003212255.GB28361@zn.tnic> <20181004080321.GA3630@8bytes.org> <20181004081429.GB1864@zn.tnic> <6cbb9135-7e89-748f-1d55-ac105a9f8091@molgen.mpg.de> <20181004084946.GD1864@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Paul Menzel Cc: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cmcgUsO2ZGVs?= , Thomas Gleixner , linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, lkml On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 10:59:18AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > I meant just the test you did. https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181003212255.GB28361@zn.tnic > The SSD is also used in the Lenovo X60 and T60, which are > 32-bit systems. And what exactly is the problem when you access it on a 64-bit OS? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.