linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86/mm: Found insecure W+X mapping at address (ptrval)/0xc00a0000
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 23:22:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181003212255.GB28361@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809281653270.2004@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 04:55:19PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Sorry for the delay and thanks for the data. A quick diff did not reveal
> anything obvious. I'll have a closer look and we probably need more (other)
> information to nail that down.

Just a brain dump of what I've found out so far.

Commenting out the init_mem_mapping() call below:

void __init init_mem_mapping(void)
{
        unsigned long end;

	...

        /* the ISA range is always mapped regardless of memory holes */
//      init_memory_mapping(0, ISA_END_ADDRESS);

changes the address the warning reports to:

[    4.392870] x86/mm: Found insecure W+X mapping at address 0xc0000000/0xc0000000

but the machine boots fine otherwise.

Which begs the question: why do we direct-map the ISA range at
PAGE_OFFSET at all? Do we have to have virtual mappings of it at all? I
thought ISA devices don't need that but this is long before my time...

Then, the warning say too:

[    4.399804] x86/mm: Checked W+X mappings: FAILED, 252 W+X pages found.

and there really are 252 pages  (I counted) which are W+X:

---[ Kernel Mapping ]---
0xc0000000-0xc0001000           4K     RW                     x  pte
0xc0001000-0xc0099000         608K     RW                     x  pte
0xc0099000-0xc009a000           4K     ro                     NX pte
0xc009a000-0xc009b000           4K     ro                     x  pte
0xc009b000-0xc009d000           8K     RW                     NX pte
0xc009d000-0xc00a0000          12K     RW                     x  pte
0xc00a0000-0xc00a2000           8K     RW                     x  pte
0xc00a2000-0xc00b8000          88K     RW                     x  pte
0xc00b8000-0xc00c0000          32K     RW                     x  pte
0xc00c0000-0xc00f3000         204K     RW                     x  pte
0xc00f3000-0xc00fc000          36K     RW                     x  pte
0xc00fc000-0xc00fd000           4K     RW                     x  pte
0xc00fd000-0xc0100000          12K     RW                     x  pte
...

but I can't find where those guys appear from. Will be adding more debug
printks to track it down.

Anyway, just a dump of the current state...

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-03 21:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-19  6:55 Paul Menzel
2018-09-19  8:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-20  7:07   ` Paul Menzel
2018-09-20 22:51     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-24 21:47       ` Paul Menzel
2018-09-28 14:55         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-03 21:22           ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2018-10-04  3:11             ` Paul Menzel
2018-10-04  7:48               ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-04  8:03             ` Joerg Roedel
2018-10-04  8:14               ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-04  8:40                 ` Paul Menzel
2018-10-04  8:49                   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-04  8:59                     ` Paul Menzel
2018-10-04 10:54                       ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-04 11:00                         ` Paul Menzel
2018-10-04 11:12                           ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-04  8:43                 ` Joerg Roedel
2018-10-04  8:48                   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-05  9:27               ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-05  9:39                 ` Paul Menzel
2018-10-08 19:37                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-08 20:08                     ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181003212255.GB28361@zn.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox