linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@techadventures.net>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: mhocko@suse.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, david@redhat.com,
	Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
	yasu.isimatu@gmail.com, malat@debian.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] Refactor node_states_check_changes_online/offline
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 15:26:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180921132634.10103-1-osalvador@techadventures.net> (raw)

From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>

v1 -> v2:
        - Address feedback from Pavel
        - Re-write patch4 his way, as it is better
        - Add Reviewed-by from Pavel

---

This patchset refactors/clean ups node_states_check_changes_online/offline
functions together with node_states_set/clear_node.

The main reason behind this patchset is that currently, these
functions are suboptimal and confusing.

For example, they contain wrong statements like:

if (N_MEMORY == N_NORMAL_MEMORY)
if (N_MEMORY =! N_NORMAL_MEMORY)
if (N_MEMORY != N_HIGH_MEMORY)
if (N_MEMORY == N_HIGH_MEMORY)

These comparasions are wrong, as N_MEMORY will never be equal
to either N_NORMAL_MEMORY or N_HIGH_MEMORY.
Although the statements do not "affect" the flow because in the way
they are placed, they are completely wrong and confusing.

I caught another misuse of this in [1].

Another thing that this patchset addresses is the fact that
some functions get called twice, or even unconditionally, without
any need.

Examples of this are:

- node_states_set_node()->node_set_state(node, N_MEMORY)

* node_states_set_node() gets called whenever we online pages,
  so we end up calling node_set_state(node, N_MEMORY) everytime.
  To avoid this, we should check if the node is already in node_state[N_MEMORY].

- node_states_set_node()->node_set_state(node, N_HIGH_MEMORY)

* On !CONFIG_HIGH_MEMORY, N_HIGH_MEMORY == N_NORMAL_MEMORY,
  but the current code sets:
  status_change_nid_high = status_change_nid_normal
  This means that we will call node_set_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) twice.
  The fix here is to set status_change_nid_normal = -1 on such systems,
  so we skip the second call.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10579155/

Oscar Salvador (4):
  mm/memory_hotplug: Spare unnecessary calls to node_set_state
  mm/memory_hotplug: Tidy up node_states_clear_node
  mm/memory_hotplug: Simplify node_states_check_changes_online
  mm/memory_hotplug: Clean up node_states_check_changes_offline

 mm/memory_hotplug.c | 146 ++++++++++++++--------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)

-- 
2.13.6

             reply	other threads:[~2018-09-21 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-21 13:26 Oscar Salvador [this message]
2018-09-21 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Spare unnecessary calls to node_set_state Oscar Salvador
2018-09-21 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Tidy up node_states_clear_node Oscar Salvador
2018-09-21 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Simplify node_states_check_changes_online Oscar Salvador
2018-09-21 14:25   ` Pasha Tatashin
2018-09-21 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Clean up node_states_check_changes_offline Oscar Salvador

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180921132634.10103-1-osalvador@techadventures.net \
    --to=osalvador@techadventures.net \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=malat@debian.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox