From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com>,
jmorris@namei.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 11/12] keys/mktme: Add a new key service type for memory encryption keys
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 15:39:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180911223933.GA2638@alison-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27768.1536703395@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 11:03:15PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > +/* Key Service Command: Creates a software key and programs hardware */
> > +int mktme_instantiate(struct key *key, struct key_preparsed_payload *prep)
> > +{
> > + struct mktme_key_program *kprog = NULL;
> > + size_t datalen = prep->datalen;
> > + char *options;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> > + return -EACCES;
> > +
> > + if (datalen <= 0 || datalen > 1024 || !prep->data)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + options = kmemdup(prep->data, datalen + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!options)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + options[datalen] = '\0';
> > +
> > + kprog = kmem_cache_zalloc(mktme_prog_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!kprog) {
> > + kzfree(options);
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > + ret = mktme_get_options(options, kprog);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto out;
>
> Everything prior to here looks like it should be in the ->preparse() routine.
> I really should get round to making that mandatory.
Hi Dave,
If a preparse routine handles all the above, then if any of the
above failures occur, the key service has less backing out to do.
Is that the point?
How do I make the connection between the preparse and the instantiate?
Do I just put what I need to remember about this key request in the
payload.data during preparse, so I can examine it again during
instantiate?
Thanks,
Alison
>
> > +
> > + mktme_map_lock();
> > + ret = mktme_program_key(key->serial, kprog);
> > + mktme_map_unlock();
> > +out:
> > + kzfree(options);
> > + kmem_cache_free(mktme_prog_cache, kprog);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
>
> David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-11 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-07 22:23 [RFC 00/12] Multi-Key Total Memory Encryption API (MKTME) Alison Schofield
2018-09-07 22:34 ` [RFC 01/12] docs/x86: Document the Multi-Key Total Memory Encryption API Alison Schofield
2018-09-08 18:44 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-09-10 1:28 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-11 0:13 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-11 0:33 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-11 0:45 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-11 1:14 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-11 0:14 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-10 17:32 ` Sakkinen, Jarkko
2018-09-11 0:19 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-07 22:34 ` [RFC 02/12] mm: Generalize the mprotect implementation to support extensions Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 10:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-09-11 0:34 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-07 22:34 ` [RFC 03/12] syscall/x86: Wire up a new system call for memory encryption keys Alison Schofield
2018-09-07 22:36 ` [RFC 04/12] x86/mm: Add helper functions to manage " Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 2:56 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-10 23:37 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-10 23:41 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 17:37 ` Sakkinen, Jarkko
2018-09-07 22:36 ` [RFC 05/12] x86/mm: Add a helper function to set keyid bits in encrypted VMA's Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 17:57 ` Sakkinen, Jarkko
2018-09-07 22:36 ` [RFC 06/12] mm: Add the encrypt_mprotect() system call Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 18:02 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-09-11 2:15 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-07 22:37 ` [RFC 07/12] x86/mm: Add helper functions to track encrypted VMA's Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 3:17 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-07 22:37 ` [RFC 08/12] mm: Track VMA's in use for each memory encryption keyid Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 18:20 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-09-11 2:39 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-07 22:37 ` [RFC 09/12] mm: Restrict memory encryption to anonymous VMA's Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 18:21 ` Sakkinen, Jarkko
2018-09-10 18:57 ` Dave Hansen
2018-09-10 21:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-09-10 21:09 ` Dave Hansen
2018-09-07 22:38 ` [RFC 10/12] x86/pconfig: Program memory encryption keys on a system-wide basis Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 1:46 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-10 18:24 ` Sakkinen, Jarkko
2018-09-11 2:46 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-11 14:31 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-09-07 22:38 ` [RFC 11/12] keys/mktme: Add a new key service type for memory encryption keys Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 3:29 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-10 21:47 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-15 0:06 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-17 10:48 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-17 22:34 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-07 22:39 ` [RFC 12/12] keys/mktme: Do not revoke in use " Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 1:10 ` [RFC 00/12] Multi-Key Total Memory Encryption API (MKTME) Huang, Kai
2018-09-10 19:10 ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-11 3:15 ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-10 17:29 ` Sakkinen, Jarkko
2018-09-11 22:03 ` [RFC 11/12] keys/mktme: Add a new key service type for memory encryption keys David Howells
2018-09-11 22:39 ` Alison Schofield [this message]
2018-09-11 23:01 ` David Howells
2018-09-11 22:56 ` [RFC 04/12] x86/mm: Add helper functions to manage " David Howells
2018-09-12 11:12 ` [RFC 12/12] keys/mktme: Do not revoke in use " David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180911223933.GA2638@alison-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@intel.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox