From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C7166B77A6 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 04:31:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id w42-v6so3268788eda.23 for ; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 01:31:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f5-v6si3725677eda.356.2018.09.06.01.31.52 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Sep 2018 01:31:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 10:31:49 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/29] mm: remove bootmem allocator implementation. Message-ID: <20180906083149.GZ14951@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1536163184-26356-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1536163184-26356-5-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180906073023.GO14951@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180906073023.GO14951@dhcp22.suse.cz> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Mike Rapoport Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , "David S. Miller" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , Michael Ellerman , Paul Burton , Thomas Gleixner , Tony Luck , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 06-09-18 09:30:23, Michal Hocko wrote: > Is there any reason to keep > > ifdef CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM > obj-y += nobootmem.o > else > obj-y += bootmem.o > endif > > behind? I can see you have done so in an earlier patch. I have missed that. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs