From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] kmemleak: Add option to print warnings to dmesg
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 11:26:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180828102621.yawpcrkikhh4kagv@armageddon.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180828101412.mb7t562roqbhsbjw@axis.com>
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 12:14:12PM +0200, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 03:16:41PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 10:38:21 +0200 Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com> wrote:
> > > --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > > +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > > @@ -593,6 +593,15 @@ config DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_DEFAULT_OFF
> > > Say Y here to disable kmemleak by default. It can then be enabled
> > > on the command line via kmemleak=on.
> > >
> > > +config DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_WARN
> > > + bool "Print kmemleak object warnings to log buffer"
> > > + depends on DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
> > > + help
> > > + Say Y here to make kmemleak print information about unreferenced
> > > + objects (including stacktraces) as warnings to the kernel log buffer.
> > > + Otherwise this information is only available by reading the kmemleak
> > > + debugfs file.
> >
> > Why add the config option? Why not simply make the change for all
> > configs?
>
> No particular reason other than preserving the current behaviour for
> existing users. I can remove the config option if Catalin is fine with
> it.
IIRC, in the early kmemleak days, people complained about it being to
noisy (the false positives rate was also much higher), so the default
behaviour was changed to monitor (almost) quietly with the details
available via debugfs. I'd like to keep this default behaviour but we
could have a "verbose" command via both debugfs and kernel parameter (as
we do with "off" and "on"). Would this work for you?
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-28 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-27 8:38 Vincent Whitchurch
2018-08-27 22:16 ` Andrew Morton
2018-08-28 10:14 ` Vincent Whitchurch
2018-08-28 10:26 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2018-08-30 7:43 ` Vincent Whitchurch
2018-08-31 14:56 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180828102621.yawpcrkikhh4kagv@armageddon.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=vincent.whitchurch@axis.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox