From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@techadventures.net>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: mhocko@suse.com, vbabka@suse.cz, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
yasu.isimatu@gmail.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,
david@redhat.com, Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Refactoring for remove_memory_section/unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 18:21:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180821162122.GA10300@techadventures.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180817090017.17610-1-osalvador@techadventures.net>
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 11:00:13AM +0200, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
>
> v3 -> v4:
> - Make nodemask_t a stack variable
> - Added Reviewed-by from David and Pavel
>
> v2 -> v3:
> - NODEMASK_FREE can deal with NULL pointers, so do not
> make it conditional (by David).
> - Split up node_online's check patch (David's suggestion)
> - Added Reviewed-by from Andrew and David
> - Fix checkpath.pl warnings
Andrew, will you pick up this patchset?
I saw that v3 was removed from the -mm tree because it was about
to be updated with a new version (this one), but I am not sure if
anything wrong happened.
Thanks
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-21 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-17 9:00 Oscar Salvador
2018-08-17 9:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] mm/memory-hotplug: Drop unused args from remove_memory_section Oscar Salvador
2018-08-17 9:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Drop mem_blk check from unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes Oscar Salvador
2018-08-17 9:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Define nodemask_t as a stack variable Oscar Salvador
2018-08-17 9:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-08-28 11:54 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-08-28 14:04 ` Pasha Tatashin
2018-08-17 9:00 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Drop node_online check in unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes Oscar Salvador
2018-08-21 16:21 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2018-08-21 20:43 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] Refactoring for remove_memory_section/unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes Andrew Morton
2018-08-29 20:50 ` Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180821162122.GA10300@techadventures.net \
--to=osalvador@techadventures.net \
--cc=Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox