From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl0-f70.google.com (mail-pl0-f70.google.com [209.85.160.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0946B209A for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 16:43:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pl0-f70.google.com with SMTP id t4-v6so12312231plo.0 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 13:43:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org. [140.211.169.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r7-v6si12952948pgh.473.2018.08.21.13.43.20 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Aug 2018 13:43:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 13:43:18 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Refactoring for remove_memory_section/unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes Message-Id: <20180821134318.f743b6c58f2b5a91e17e596e@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20180821162122.GA10300@techadventures.net> References: <20180817090017.17610-1-osalvador@techadventures.net> <20180821162122.GA10300@techadventures.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Oscar Salvador Cc: mhocko@suse.com, vbabka@suse.cz, dan.j.williams@intel.com, yasu.isimatu@gmail.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, david@redhat.com, Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oscar Salvador On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 18:21:22 +0200 Oscar Salvador wrote: > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 11:00:13AM +0200, Oscar Salvador wrote: > > From: Oscar Salvador > > > > v3 -> v4: > > - Make nodemask_t a stack variable > > - Added Reviewed-by from David and Pavel > > > > v2 -> v3: > > - NODEMASK_FREE can deal with NULL pointers, so do not > > make it conditional (by David). > > - Split up node_online's check patch (David's suggestion) > > - Added Reviewed-by from Andrew and David > > - Fix checkpath.pl warnings > > Andrew, will you pick up this patchset? > I saw that v3 was removed from the -mm tree because it was about > to be updated with a new version (this one), but I am not sure if > anything wrong happened. Yes, things are still changing and we're late in the merge window. I decided to park it and shall take it up again after 4.19-rc1.