From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: memcg: update memcg OOM messages on cgroup2
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 08:09:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180807150944.GA3978217@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180807071332.GR10003@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 09:13:32AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > * It's the same information as memory.stat but would be in a different
> > format and will likely be a bit of an eyeful.
> >
> > * It can easily become a really long line. Each kernel log can be ~1k
> > in length and there can be other limits in the log pipeline
> > (e.g. netcons).
>
> Are we getting close to those limits?
Yeah, I think the stats we have can already go close to or over 500
bytes easily, which is already pushing the netcons udp packet size
limit.
> > * The information is already multi-line and cgroup oom kills don't
> > take down the system, so there's no need to worry about scroll back
> > that much. Also, not printing recursive info means the output is
> > well-bound.
>
> Well, on the other hand you can have a lot of memcgs under OOM and then
> swamp the log a lot.
idk, the info dump is already multi-line. If we have a lot of memcgs
under OOM, we're already kinda messed up (e.g. we can't tell which
line is for which oom). This adds to that to a certain extent but not
by much. In practice, this doesn't seem to be a signficant problem.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-07 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-03 17:57 [PATCH] " Tejun Heo
2018-08-03 20:30 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-08-06 15:55 ` Johannes Weiner
2018-08-06 15:48 ` Johannes Weiner
2018-08-06 16:15 ` [PATCH v2] " Tejun Heo
2018-08-06 16:34 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-08-06 18:08 ` Andrew Morton
2018-08-06 18:19 ` Tejun Heo
2018-09-19 17:17 ` Johannes Weiner
2018-08-06 20:06 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-06 20:19 ` Tejun Heo
2018-08-07 7:13 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-07 15:09 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-08-07 17:54 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180807150944.GA3978217@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox