From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
"open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-patch-test@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm:memcg: skip memcg of current in mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 08:18:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180803061817.GC27245@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGWkznE_Z+eJ+81eZN_KT7KXSFyCxfoafeMFSzirT7OaL+vbRA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri 03-08-18 14:11:26, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:48 PM Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > for the soft_limit reclaim has more directivity than global reclaim, we40960
> > have current memcg be skipped to avoid potential page thrashing.
> >
> The patch is tested in our android system with 2GB ram. The case
> mainly focus on the smooth slide of pictures on a gallery, which used
> to stall on the direct reclaim for over several hundred
> millionseconds. By further debugging, we find that the direct reclaim
> spend most of time to reclaim pages on its own with softlimit set to
> 40960KB. I add a ftrace event to verify that the patch can help
> escaping such scenario. Furthermore, we also measured the major fault
> of this process(by dumpsys of android). The result is the patch can
> help to reduce 20% of the major fault during the test.
I have asked already asked. Why do you use the soft limit in the first
place? It is known to cause excessive reclaim and long stalls.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-03 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-03 5:48 Zhaoyang Huang
2018-08-03 6:11 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2018-08-03 6:18 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-08-03 6:59 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2018-08-03 7:07 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-03 6:15 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180803061817.GC27245@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=huangzhaoyang@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-patch-test@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox