From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-f69.google.com (mail-wr1-f69.google.com [209.85.221.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA956B0006 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 17:23:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr1-f69.google.com with SMTP id p7-v6so1909721wrv.15 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 14:23:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com. [148.163.158.5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l8-v6si4164405wrv.161.2018.07.27.14.23.51 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 14:23:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w6RLIW2v017642 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 17:23:50 -0400 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2kgb0ngg6u-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 17:23:49 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 22:23:48 +0100 Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 00:23:40 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: switch to NO_BOOTMEM References: <1531727262-11520-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180726070355.GD8477@rapoport-lnx> <20180726172005.pgjmkvwz2lpflpor@pburton-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180726172005.pgjmkvwz2lpflpor@pburton-laptop> Message-Id: <20180727212339.GC17745@rapoport-lnx> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Paul Burton Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Ralf Baechle , James Hogan , Huacai Chen , Michal Hocko , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Serge Semin On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:20:05AM -0700, Paul Burton wrote: > Hi Mike, > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:03:56AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > Any comments on this? > > I haven't looked at this in detail yet, but there was a much larger > series submitted to accomplish this not too long ago, which needed > another revision: > > https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/project/linux-mips/list/?series=787&state=* > > Given that, I'd be (pleasantly) surprised if this one smaller patch is > enough. I didn't test it on the real hardware, so I could have missed something. I've looked at Sergey's patches, largely we are doing the same things. > Thanks, > Paul > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.