From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg1-f200.google.com (mail-pg1-f200.google.com [209.85.215.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1AC06B0003 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 03:59:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pg1-f200.google.com with SMTP id e19-v6so5409985pgv.11 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:59:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v129-v6si1189530pgv.610.2018.07.20.00.59.46 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:59:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 09:59:33 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/39 v8] PTI support for x86-32 Message-ID: <20180720075933.fegnjnhgouclitft@suse.de> References: <1531906876-13451-1-git-send-email-joro@8bytes.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Joerg Roedel , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , Josh Poimboeuf , Juergen Gross , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , Jiri Kosina , Boris Ostrovsky , Brian Gerst , David Laight , Denys Vlasenko , Eduardo Valentin , Greg KH , Will Deacon , aliguori@amazon.com, daniel.gruss@iaik.tugraz.at, hughd@google.com, keescook@google.com, Andrea Arcangeli , Waiman Long , Pavel Machek , "David H . Gutteridge" Hi Thomas, On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 01:21:33AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > > here is version 8 of my patches to enable PTI on x86-32. The > > last version got some good review which I mostly worked into > > this version. > > I went over the whole set once again and did not find any real issues. As > the outstanding review comments are addressed, I decided that only broader > exposure can shake out eventually remaining issues. Applied and pushed out, > so it should show up in linux-next soon. > > The mm regression seems to be sorted, so there is no immeditate fallout > expected. > > Thanks for your patience in reworking this over and over. Thanks to Andy > for putting his entry focssed eyes on it more than once. Great work! Thanks a lot too! Let's hope things will go smooth from here... I will also continue testing and improving the code, currently I am working on a relaxed paranoid entry/exit path suggested by Andy. Regards, Joerg