From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
"kirill.shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm: always flush VMA ranges affected by zap_page_range"
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 14:12:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180716131246.iacuzs5ntzktangk@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180706131019.51e3a5f0@imladris.surriel.com>
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 01:10:19PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> There was a bug in Linux that could cause madvise (and mprotect?)
> system calls to return to userspace without the TLB having been
> flushed for all the pages involved.
>
> This could happen when multiple threads of a process made simultaneous
> madvise and/or mprotect calls.
>
> This was noticed in the summer of 2017, at which time two solutions
> were created:
> 56236a59556c ("mm: refactor TLB gathering API")
> 99baac21e458 ("mm: fix MADV_[FREE|DONTNEED] TLB flush miss problem")
> and
> 4647706ebeee ("mm: always flush VMA ranges affected by zap_page_range")
>
> We need only one of these solutions, and the former appears to be
> a little more efficient than the latter, so revert that one.
>
> This reverts commit 4647706ebeee6e50f7b9f922b095f4ec94d581c3.
> ---
> mm/memory.c | 14 +-------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-16 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-06 17:03 mm,tlb: revert 4647706ebeee? Rik van Riel
2018-07-06 17:10 ` [PATCH] Revert "mm: always flush VMA ranges affected by zap_page_range" Rik van Riel
2018-07-16 13:12 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2018-07-07 15:25 ` mm,tlb: revert 4647706ebeee? Nicholas Piggin
2018-07-10 0:13 ` Andrew Morton
2018-07-10 5:04 ` Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180716131246.iacuzs5ntzktangk@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox