* Re: BUG: corrupted list in cpu_stop_queue_work [not found] ` <000000000000693c7d057087caf3@google.com> @ 2018-07-09 12:55 ` Tetsuo Handa 2018-07-09 13:32 ` Matthew Wilcox 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Tetsuo Handa @ 2018-07-09 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: syzbot, bigeasy, linux-kernel, matt, mingo, peterz, syzkaller-bugs, tglx, linux-mm Hello Matthew, It seems to me that there are other locations which do not check xas_store() failure. Is that really OK? If they are OK, I think we want a comment like /* This never fails. */ or /* Failure is OK because ... */ for each call without failure check. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: BUG: corrupted list in cpu_stop_queue_work 2018-07-09 12:55 ` BUG: corrupted list in cpu_stop_queue_work Tetsuo Handa @ 2018-07-09 13:32 ` Matthew Wilcox 2018-07-09 14:15 ` Tetsuo Handa 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2018-07-09 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tetsuo Handa Cc: syzbot, bigeasy, linux-kernel, matt, mingo, peterz, syzkaller-bugs, tglx, linux-mm On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 09:55:17PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Hello Matthew, > > It seems to me that there are other locations which do not check xas_store() > failure. Is that really OK? If they are OK, I think we want a comment like > /* This never fails. */ or /* Failure is OK because ... */ > for each call without failure check. Good grief, no, I'm not adding a comment to all 50 calls to xas_store(). Here are some rules: - xas_store(NULL) cannot fail. - xas_store(p) cannot fail if we know something was already in that slot beforehand (ie a replace operation). - xas_store(p) cannot fail if xas_create_range() was previously successful. - xas_store(p) can fail, but it's OK if the only things after that are other xas_*() calls. Because every xas_*() call checks xas_error(). So this is fine: do { xas_store(&xas, p); xas_set_tag(&xas, XA_TAG_0); } while (xas_nomem(&xas, GFP_KERNEL)); > >From d6f24d6eecd79836502527624f8086f4e3e4c331 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> > Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 15:58:44 +0900 > Subject: [PATCH] shmem: Fix crash upon xas_store() failure. > > syzbot is reporting list corruption [1]. This is because xas_store() from > shmem_add_to_page_cache() is not handling memory allocation failure. Fix > this by checking xas_error() after xas_store(). I have no idea why you wrote this patch on Monday when I already said I knew what the problem was on Friday, fixed the problem and pushed it out to my git tree on Saturday. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: BUG: corrupted list in cpu_stop_queue_work 2018-07-09 13:32 ` Matthew Wilcox @ 2018-07-09 14:15 ` Tetsuo Handa 2018-07-09 14:24 ` Matthew Wilcox 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Tetsuo Handa @ 2018-07-09 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: syzbot, bigeasy, linux-kernel, matt, mingo, peterz, syzkaller-bugs, tglx, linux-mm On 2018/07/09 22:32, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >> >From d6f24d6eecd79836502527624f8086f4e3e4c331 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> >> Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 15:58:44 +0900 >> Subject: [PATCH] shmem: Fix crash upon xas_store() failure. >> >> syzbot is reporting list corruption [1]. This is because xas_store() from >> shmem_add_to_page_cache() is not handling memory allocation failure. Fix >> this by checking xas_error() after xas_store(). > > I have no idea why you wrote this patch on Monday when I already said > I knew what the problem was on Friday, fixed the problem and pushed it > out to my git tree on Saturday. > Because syzbot found a C reproducer on 2018/07/09 02:29 UTC, and your fix was not in time for a kernel version syzbot was testing, and you were not listed as a recipient of this bug, and I didn't know you already fixed this bug. Anyway, linux-next-20180709 still does not have this fix. What is the title of your fix you pushed on Saturday? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: BUG: corrupted list in cpu_stop_queue_work 2018-07-09 14:15 ` Tetsuo Handa @ 2018-07-09 14:24 ` Matthew Wilcox 2018-07-09 14:34 ` Tetsuo Handa 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2018-07-09 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tetsuo Handa Cc: syzbot, bigeasy, linux-kernel, matt, mingo, peterz, syzkaller-bugs, tglx, linux-mm On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 11:15:54PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > On 2018/07/09 22:32, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > >> >From d6f24d6eecd79836502527624f8086f4e3e4c331 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> > >> Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 15:58:44 +0900 > >> Subject: [PATCH] shmem: Fix crash upon xas_store() failure. > >> > >> syzbot is reporting list corruption [1]. This is because xas_store() from > >> shmem_add_to_page_cache() is not handling memory allocation failure. Fix > >> this by checking xas_error() after xas_store(). > > > > I have no idea why you wrote this patch on Monday when I already said > > I knew what the problem was on Friday, fixed the problem and pushed it > > out to my git tree on Saturday. > > > > Because syzbot found a C reproducer on 2018/07/09 02:29 UTC, and your fix was > not in time for a kernel version syzbot was testing, and you were not listed > as a recipient of this bug, and I didn't know you already fixed this bug. > > Anyway, linux-next-20180709 still does not have this fix. > What is the title of your fix you pushed on Saturday? I folded it into shmem: Convert shmem_add_to_page_cache to XArray. I can see it's fixed in today's linux-next. I fixed it differently from the way you fixed it, so if you're looking for an xas_error check after xas_store, you won't find it. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: BUG: corrupted list in cpu_stop_queue_work 2018-07-09 14:24 ` Matthew Wilcox @ 2018-07-09 14:34 ` Tetsuo Handa 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Tetsuo Handa @ 2018-07-09 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: syzbot, bigeasy, linux-kernel, matt, mingo, peterz, syzkaller-bugs, tglx, linux-mm On 2018/07/09 23:24, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >> Anyway, linux-next-20180709 still does not have this fix. >> What is the title of your fix you pushed on Saturday? > > I folded it into shmem: Convert shmem_add_to_page_cache to XArray. > I can see it's fixed in today's linux-next. I fixed it differently > from the way you fixed it, so if you're looking for an xas_error check > after xas_store, you won't find it. > OK. linux-next-20180709 should no longer hit this bug. Closing with #syz fix: shmem: Convert shmem_add_to_page_cache to XArray Thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-07-09 14:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <00000000000032412205706753b5@google.com>
[not found] ` <000000000000693c7d057087caf3@google.com>
2018-07-09 12:55 ` BUG: corrupted list in cpu_stop_queue_work Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-09 13:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-07-09 14:15 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-09 14:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-07-09 14:34 ` Tetsuo Handa
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox