From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+d8a8e42dfba0454286ff@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
bigeasy@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: corrupted list in cpu_stop_queue_work
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 06:32:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180709133212.GA2662@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271c58e-876b-0df3-3224-319d82634663@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 09:55:17PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Hello Matthew,
>
> It seems to me that there are other locations which do not check xas_store()
> failure. Is that really OK? If they are OK, I think we want a comment like
> /* This never fails. */ or /* Failure is OK because ... */
> for each call without failure check.
Good grief, no, I'm not adding a comment to all 50 calls to
xas_store(). Here are some rules:
- xas_store(NULL) cannot fail.
- xas_store(p) cannot fail if we know something was already in
that slot beforehand (ie a replace operation).
- xas_store(p) cannot fail if xas_create_range() was previously
successful.
- xas_store(p) can fail, but it's OK if the only things after that are
other xas_*() calls. Because every xas_*() call checks xas_error().
So this is fine:
do {
xas_store(&xas, p);
xas_set_tag(&xas, XA_TAG_0);
} while (xas_nomem(&xas, GFP_KERNEL));
> >From d6f24d6eecd79836502527624f8086f4e3e4c331 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 15:58:44 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] shmem: Fix crash upon xas_store() failure.
>
> syzbot is reporting list corruption [1]. This is because xas_store() from
> shmem_add_to_page_cache() is not handling memory allocation failure. Fix
> this by checking xas_error() after xas_store().
I have no idea why you wrote this patch on Monday when I already said
I knew what the problem was on Friday, fixed the problem and pushed it
out to my git tree on Saturday.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-09 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <00000000000032412205706753b5@google.com>
[not found] ` <000000000000693c7d057087caf3@google.com>
2018-07-09 12:55 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-09 13:32 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2018-07-09 14:15 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-09 14:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-07-09 14:34 ` Tetsuo Handa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180709133212.GA2662@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=syzbot+d8a8e42dfba0454286ff@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox