linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@techadventures.net>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>,
	dave.hansen@intel.com, pagupta@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] mm/sparse: Optimize memmap allocation during sparse_init()
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 10:09:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180708020916.GH3047@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180628062857.29658-1-bhe@redhat.com>

Hi Andrew,

Could you pick this series into mm tree so that it can catch 4.18i 1/4 ?

Thanks
Baoquan

On 06/28/18 at 02:28pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> This is v6 post.
> 
> In sparse_init(), two temporary pointer arrays, usemap_map and map_map
> are allocated with the size of NR_MEM_SECTIONS. They are used to store
> each memory section's usemap and mem map if marked as present. In
> 5-level paging mode, this will cost 512M memory though they will be
> released at the end of sparse_init(). System with few memory, like
> kdump kernel which usually only has about 256M, will fail to boot
> because of allocation failure if CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL=y.
> 
> In this patchset, optimize the memmap allocation code to only use
> usemap_map and map_map with the size of nr_present_sections. This
> makes kdump kernel boot up with normal crashkernel='' setting when
> CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL=y.
> 
> The old version can be found below:
> 
> v5:
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180627013116.12411-1-bhe@redhat.com
> v4:
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180521101555.25610-1-bhe@redhat.com
> 
> v3:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/2/27/928
> 
> V1 can be found here:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg144486.html
> 
> Change log:
> v5->v6:
>   Oscar found the redundant "struct mem_section *ms" definition and
>   in the old patch 2/4, after deferring the clearing of section_mem_map.
>   Clean them up in this version.
> 
>   Pavel pointed out that allocating memmap together for one node at
>   one time should be a default behaviour for all ARCH-es. And if failed
>   on large memory, it will drop to the fallback to allocate memmap
>   for one section at one time, it shoult not break anything. Add
>   patch 5/5 to remove CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_ALLOC_MEM_MAP_TOGETHER and clean
>   up the related codes.
> v4->v5:
>   Improve patch 3/4 log according to Dave's suggestion.
> 
>   Correct the wrong copy&paste of making 'nr_consumed_maps' to
>   'alloc_usemap_and_memmap' mistakenly which is pointed out by
>   Dave in patch 4/4 code comment.
> 
>   Otherwise, no code change in this version.
> v3->v4:
>   Improve according to Dave's three concerns which are in patch 0004:
> 
>   Rename variable 'idx_present' to 'nr_consumed_maps' which used to
>   index the memmap and usemap of present sections.
> 
>   Add a check if 'nr_consumed_maps' goes beyond nr_present_sections.
> 
>   Add code comment above the final for_each_present_section_nr() to
>   tell why 'nr_consumed_maps' need be increased in each iteration
>   whether the 'ms->section_mem_map' need cleared or out.
> 
> v2->v3:
>   Change nr_present_sections as __initdata and add code comment
>   according to Andrew's suggestion.
> 
>   Change the local variable 'i' as idx_present which loops over the
>   present sections, and improve the code. These are suggested by
>   Dave and Pankaj.
> 
>   Add a new patch 0003 which adds a new parameter 'data_unit_size'
>   to function alloc_usemap_and_memmap() in which we will update 'data'
>   to make it point at new position. However its type 'void *' can't give
>   us needed info to do that. Need pass the unit size in. So change code
>   in patch 0004 accordingly. This is a code bug fix found when tested
>   the memory deployed on multiple nodes.
> 
> v1-v2:
>   Split out the nr_present_sections adding as a single patch for easier
>   reviewing.
> 
>   Rewrite patch log according to Dave's suggestion.
> 
>   Fix code bug in patch 0002 reported by test robot.
> 
> Baoquan He (5):
>   mm/sparse: Add a static variable nr_present_sections
>   mm/sparsemem: Defer the ms->section_mem_map clearing
>   mm/sparse: Add a new parameter 'data_unit_size' for
>     alloc_usemap_and_memmap
>   mm/sparse: Optimize memmap allocation during sparse_init()
>   mm/sparse: Remove CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_ALLOC_MEM_MAP_TOGETHER
> 
>  mm/Kconfig          |   4 --
>  mm/sparse-vmemmap.c |   9 ++---
>  mm/sparse.c         | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.13.6
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-08  2:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-28  6:28 Baoquan He
2018-06-28  6:28 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] mm/sparse: Add a static variable nr_present_sections Baoquan He
2018-06-28 11:24   ` Oscar Salvador
2018-06-28  6:28 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] mm/sparsemem: Defer the ms->section_mem_map clearing Baoquan He
2018-06-28 11:19   ` Oscar Salvador
2018-06-28  6:28 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] mm/sparse: Add a new parameter 'data_unit_size' for alloc_usemap_and_memmap Baoquan He
2018-06-28 13:08   ` Oscar Salvador
2018-06-28  6:28 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] mm/sparse: Optimize memmap allocation during sparse_init() Baoquan He
2018-06-28 12:09   ` Oscar Salvador
2018-06-28 12:12     ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-28 13:12       ` Oscar Salvador
2018-06-28 14:05       ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-28 14:09         ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-28  6:28 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] mm/sparse: Remove CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_ALLOC_MEM_MAP_TOGETHER Baoquan He
2018-06-28 12:15   ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-11 22:26   ` [v6,5/5] " Guenter Roeck
2018-07-08  2:09 ` Baoquan He [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180708020916.GH3047@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=osalvador@techadventures.net \
    --cc=pagupta@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox