From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
Received: from mail-pf0-f200.google.com (mail-pf0-f200.google.com [209.85.192.200])
	by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B286B0269
	for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Fri,  6 Jul 2018 18:41:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-f200.google.com with SMTP id y16-v6so3577928pfe.16
        for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Fri, 06 Jul 2018 15:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org. [140.211.169.12])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l20-v6si8615068pgo.471.2018.07.06.15.41.37
        for <linux-mm@kvack.org>
        (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Fri, 06 Jul 2018 15:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 15:41:35 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v10 0/6] optimize memblock_next_valid_pfn and
 early_pfn_valid on arm and arm64
Message-Id: <20180706154135.1bbb6f4999f664a2ffadbc53@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <1530867675-9018-1-git-send-email-hejianet@gmail.com>
References: <1530867675-9018-1-git-send-email-hejianet@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org>
To: Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>, Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>, Philip Derrin <philip@cog.systems>, AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>, Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>, Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Kemi Wang <kemi.wang@intel.com>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>, YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>, Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>, Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>, Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>, Daniel Vacek <neelx@redhat.com>, Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org

On Fri,  6 Jul 2018 17:01:09 +0800 Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com> wrote:

> Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns
> where possible") optimized the loop in memmap_init_zone(). But it causes
> possible panic bug. So Daniel Vacek reverted it later.
> 
> But as suggested by Daniel Vacek, it is fine to using memblock to skip
> gaps and finding next valid frame with CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID.
> 
> More from what Daniel said:
> "On arm and arm64, memblock is used by default. But generic version of
> pfn_valid() is based on mem sections and memblock_next_valid_pfn() does
> not always return the next valid one but skips more resulting in some
> valid frames to be skipped (as if they were invalid). And that's why
> kernel was eventually crashing on some !arm machines."
> 
> About the performance consideration:
> As said by James in b92df1de5,
> "I have tested this patch on a virtual model of a Samurai CPU with a
> sparse memory map.  The kernel boot time drops from 109 to 62 seconds."
> Thus it would be better if we remain memblock_next_valid_pfn on arm/arm64.
> 
> Besides we can remain memblock_next_valid_pfn, there is still some room
> for improvement. After this set, I can see the time overhead of memmap_init
> is reduced from 27956us to 13537us in my armv8a server(QDF2400 with 96G
> memory, pagesize 64k). I believe arm server will benefit more if memory is
> larger than TBs

It's a shame that we're at v10, still with very little evidence of
review activity.

Oh well, it's a nice speedup.  I'll toss it in and see what happens,
but I'm not very familiar with memblock so we should try to find
reviewers, please.