From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@techadventures.net>
Cc: Zi Yan <zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
syzbot <syzbot+5dcb560fe12aa5091c06@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, mst@redhat.com,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
ying.huang@intel.com
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at mm/gup.c:LINE!
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 07:35:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180706053545.GD32658@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180705123017.GA31959@techadventures.net>
On Thu 05-07-18 14:30:17, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 09:18:39AM +0200, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> >
> > > This is more than unexpected. The patch merely move the alignment check
> > > up. I will try to investigate some more but I am off for next four days
> > > and won't be online most of the time.
> > >
> > > Btw. does the same happen if you keep do_brk helper and add the length
> > > sanitization there as well?
>
> I took another look.
> The problem was that while deleting the check in do_brk_flags(), this left then "len"
> local variable with an unset value, but we need it to contain the request value
> because we do use it in further calls in do_brk_flags(), like:
Very well spotted. Thanks for noticing! I am really half online so I
cannot give it much testing right now. But here is the updated patch
with the changelog. I cannot really tell whether the other change to
align up in load_elf_library is correct as well. It seems OK but
everything around elf loading is tricky from my past experience.
My patch simply makes vm_brk_flags behavior consistent so I believe we
should do that regardless (unless I've screwed something else here of
course).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-06 5:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-04 4:19 syzbot
2018-07-04 10:01 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-04 11:17 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-04 11:48 ` Zi Yan
2018-07-04 12:11 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-04 15:15 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-07-05 0:35 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-05 7:18 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-07-05 11:40 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-07-05 6:44 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-05 7:18 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-07-05 12:30 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-07-05 13:40 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-07-06 5:35 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-07-06 7:40 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-07-06 7:50 ` [PATCH] mm: do not bug_on on incorrect lenght in __mm_populate kbuild test robot
2018-07-06 8:23 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-07-06 9:02 ` Michal Hocko
2018-07-04 12:12 ` kernel BUG at mm/gup.c:LINE! Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180706053545.GD32658@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=osalvador@techadventures.net \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=syzbot+5dcb560fe12aa5091c06@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox