From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] mm/list_lru: Introduce list_lru_shrink_walk_irq()
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 16:52:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180703145235.28050-5-bigeasy@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180703145235.28050-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Provide list_lru_shrink_walk_irq() and let it behave like
list_lru_walk_one() except that it locks the spinlock with
spin_lock_irq(). This is used by scan_shadow_nodes() because its lock
nests within the i_pages lock which is acquired with IRQ.
This change allows to use proper locking promitives instead hand crafted
lock_irq_disable() plus spin_lock().
There is no EXPORT_SYMBOL provided because the current user is in-KERNEL
only.
Add list_lru_shrink_walk_irq() which acquires the spinlock with the
proper locking primitives.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
include/linux/list_lru.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/list_lru.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
mm/workingset.c | 8 ++------
3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/list_lru.h b/include/linux/list_lru.h
index 96def9d15b1b..798c41743657 100644
--- a/include/linux/list_lru.h
+++ b/include/linux/list_lru.h
@@ -162,6 +162,23 @@ unsigned long list_lru_walk_one(struct list_lru *lru,
int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
list_lru_walk_cb isolate, void *cb_arg,
unsigned long *nr_to_walk);
+/**
+ * list_lru_walk_one_irq: walk a list_lru, isolating and disposing freeable items.
+ * @lru: the lru pointer.
+ * @nid: the node id to scan from.
+ * @memcg: the cgroup to scan from.
+ * @isolate: callback function that is resposible for deciding what to do with
+ * the item currently being scanned
+ * @cb_arg: opaque type that will be passed to @isolate
+ * @nr_to_walk: how many items to scan.
+ *
+ * Same as @list_lru_walk_one except that the spinlock is acquired with
+ * spin_lock_irq().
+ */
+unsigned long list_lru_walk_one_irq(struct list_lru *lru,
+ int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ list_lru_walk_cb isolate, void *cb_arg,
+ unsigned long *nr_to_walk);
unsigned long list_lru_walk_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid,
list_lru_walk_cb isolate, void *cb_arg,
unsigned long *nr_to_walk);
@@ -174,6 +191,14 @@ list_lru_shrink_walk(struct list_lru *lru, struct shrink_control *sc,
&sc->nr_to_scan);
}
+static inline unsigned long
+list_lru_shrink_walk_irq(struct list_lru *lru, struct shrink_control *sc,
+ list_lru_walk_cb isolate, void *cb_arg)
+{
+ return list_lru_walk_one_irq(lru, sc->nid, sc->memcg, isolate, cb_arg,
+ &sc->nr_to_scan);
+}
+
static inline unsigned long
list_lru_walk(struct list_lru *lru, list_lru_walk_cb isolate,
void *cb_arg, unsigned long nr_to_walk)
diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c
index 4d7f981e6144..1bf53a08cda8 100644
--- a/mm/list_lru.c
+++ b/mm/list_lru.c
@@ -267,6 +267,21 @@ list_lru_walk_one(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_walk_one);
+unsigned long
+list_lru_walk_one_irq(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ list_lru_walk_cb isolate, void *cb_arg,
+ unsigned long *nr_to_walk)
+{
+ struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
+ unsigned long ret;
+
+ spin_lock_irq(&nlru->lock);
+ ret = __list_lru_walk_one(nlru, memcg_cache_id(memcg), isolate, cb_arg,
+ nr_to_walk);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&nlru->lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
unsigned long list_lru_walk_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid,
list_lru_walk_cb isolate, void *cb_arg,
unsigned long *nr_to_walk)
diff --git a/mm/workingset.c b/mm/workingset.c
index 529480c21f93..aa75c0027079 100644
--- a/mm/workingset.c
+++ b/mm/workingset.c
@@ -480,13 +480,9 @@ static enum lru_status shadow_lru_isolate(struct list_head *item,
static unsigned long scan_shadow_nodes(struct shrinker *shrinker,
struct shrink_control *sc)
{
- unsigned long ret;
-
/* list_lru lock nests inside the IRQ-safe i_pages lock */
- local_irq_disable();
- ret = list_lru_shrink_walk(&shadow_nodes, sc, shadow_lru_isolate, NULL);
- local_irq_enable();
- return ret;
+ return list_lru_shrink_walk_irq(&shadow_nodes, sc, shadow_lru_isolate,
+ NULL);
}
static struct shrinker workingset_shadow_shrinker = {
--
2.18.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-03 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-22 15:12 [PATCH 0/3] mm: use irq locking suffix instead local_irq_disable() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-06-22 15:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: workingset: remove local_irq_disable() from count_shadow_nodes() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-06-24 19:51 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-06-25 10:36 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-06-22 15:12 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: workingset: make shadow_lru_isolate() use locking suffix Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-06-24 19:57 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-06-26 21:25 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-06-27 8:50 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-06-27 9:20 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-06-28 9:30 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-07-02 22:38 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-06-22 15:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: list_lru: Add lock_irq member to __list_lru_init() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-06-24 20:09 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-07-03 14:52 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-07-03 14:52 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm/list_lru: use list_lru_walk_one() in list_lru_walk_node() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-07-03 14:52 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/list_lru: Move locking from __list_lru_walk_one() to its caller Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-07-03 14:52 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/list_lru: Pass struct list_lru_node as an argument __list_lru_walk_one() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-07-03 14:52 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2018-07-03 21:14 ` Andrew Morton
2018-07-03 21:44 ` Re: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-07-04 14:44 ` Re: Vladimir Davydov
2018-06-22 21:39 ` [PATCH 0/3] mm: use irq locking suffix instead local_irq_disable() Andrew Morton
2018-06-24 20:10 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-07-16 11:19 [PATCH 0/4] mm/list_lru: Add list_lru_shrink_walk_irq() and a user Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-07-16 11:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/list_lru: Introduce list_lru_shrink_walk_irq() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180703145235.28050-5-bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc="[PATCH 0/4]"@kvack.org \
--cc="mm/list_lru:add"@kvack.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=and@kvack.org \
--cc=it@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=list_lru_shrink_walk_irq@kvack.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=use@kvack.org \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox