From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f71.google.com (mail-lf0-f71.google.com [209.85.215.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD22F6B0003 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 12:53:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lf0-f71.google.com with SMTP id r1-v6so2657367lfi.16 for ; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 09:53:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com (mx0b-00082601.pphosted.com. [67.231.153.30]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e13-v6si7113773lfi.29.2018.07.02.09.53.19 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Jul 2018 09:53:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:52:27 -0700 From: Roman Gushchin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] mm: rename and change semantics of nr_indirectly_reclaimable_bytes Message-ID: <20180702165223.GA17295@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com> References: <20180618091808.4419-6-vbabka@suse.cz> <201806201923.mC5ZpigB%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <38c6a6e1-c5e0-fd7d-4baf-1f0f09be5094@suse.cz> <20180629211201.GA14897@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter , David Rientjes , Mel Gorman , Matthew Wilcox , Vijayanand Jitta , Laura Abbott , Sumit Semwal On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 12:09:27PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 06/29/2018 11:12 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote: > >> > >> The vmstat counter NR_INDIRECTLY_RECLAIMABLE_BYTES was introduced by commit > >> eb59254608bc ("mm: introduce NR_INDIRECTLY_RECLAIMABLE_BYTES") with the goal of > >> accounting objects that can be reclaimed, but cannot be allocated via a > >> SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT cache. This is now possible via kmalloc() with > >> __GFP_RECLAIMABLE flag, and the dcache external names user is converted. > >> > >> The counter is however still useful for accounting direct page allocations > >> (i.e. not slab) with a shrinker, such as the ION page pool. So keep it, and: > > > > Btw, it looks like I've another example of usefulness of this counter: > > dynamic per-cpu data. > > Hmm, but are those reclaimable? Most likely not in general? Do you have > examples that are? If these per-cpu data is something like per-cpu refcounters, which are using to manage reclaimable objects (e.g. cgroup css objects). Of course, they are not always reclaimable, but in certain states. Thanks!