From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@techadventures.net>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Cc: bhe@redhat.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
dave.hansen@intel.com, pagupta@redhat.com,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] mm/sparse: Optimize memmap allocation during sparse_init()
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 15:12:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180628131252.GB13985@techadventures.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGM2reZsZVhhg2=dQZf6D-NmPTFRN-_95+s61pC7Axz5G5mkMQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 08:12:04AM -0400, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> > > + if (nr_consumed_maps >= nr_present_sections) {
> > > + pr_err("nr_consumed_maps goes beyond nr_present_sections\n");
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> >
> > Hi Baoquan,
> >
> > I am sure I am missing something here, but is this check really needed?
> >
> > I mean, for_each_present_section_nr() only returns the section nr if the section
> > has been marked as SECTION_MARKED_PRESENT.
> > That happens in memory_present(), where now we also increment nr_present_sections whenever
> > we find a present section.
> >
> > So, for_each_present_section_nr() should return the same nr of section as nr_present_sections.
> > Since we only increment nr_consumed_maps once in the loop, I am not so sure we can
> > go beyond nr_present_sections.
> >
> > Did I overlook something?
>
> You did not, this is basically a safety check. A BUG_ON() would be
> better here. As, this something that should really not happening, and
> would mean a bug in the current project.
I think we would be better off having a BUG_ON() there.
Otherwise the system can go sideways later on.
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-28 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-28 6:28 [PATCH v6 0/5] " Baoquan He
2018-06-28 6:28 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] mm/sparse: Add a static variable nr_present_sections Baoquan He
2018-06-28 11:24 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-06-28 6:28 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] mm/sparsemem: Defer the ms->section_mem_map clearing Baoquan He
2018-06-28 11:19 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-06-28 6:28 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] mm/sparse: Add a new parameter 'data_unit_size' for alloc_usemap_and_memmap Baoquan He
2018-06-28 13:08 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-06-28 6:28 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] mm/sparse: Optimize memmap allocation during sparse_init() Baoquan He
2018-06-28 12:09 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-06-28 12:12 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-28 13:12 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2018-06-28 14:05 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-28 14:09 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-28 6:28 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] mm/sparse: Remove CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_ALLOC_MEM_MAP_TOGETHER Baoquan He
2018-06-28 12:15 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-11 22:26 ` [v6,5/5] " Guenter Roeck
2018-07-08 2:09 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] mm/sparse: Optimize memmap allocation during sparse_init() Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180628131252.GB13985@techadventures.net \
--to=osalvador@techadventures.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pagupta@redhat.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox