From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
acme@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org,
"open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 2/2] mm: mmap: zap pages with read mmap_sem for large mapping
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 13:51:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180628115101.GE32348@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a52f0585-ebec-d098-2775-f55bde3519a4@linux.alibaba.com>
On Wed 27-06-18 10:23:39, Yang Shi wrote:
>
>
> On 6/27/18 12:24 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 26-06-18 18:03:34, Yang Shi wrote:
> > >
> > > On 6/26/18 12:43 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 05:06:23PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> > > > > By looking this deeper, we may not be able to cover all the unmapping range
> > > > > for VM_DEAD, for example, if the start addr is in the middle of a vma. We
> > > > > can't set VM_DEAD to that vma since that would trigger SIGSEGV for still
> > > > > mapped area.
> > > > >
> > > > > splitting can't be done with read mmap_sem held, so maybe just set VM_DEAD
> > > > > to non-overlapped vmas. Access to overlapped vmas (first and last) will
> > > > > still have undefined behavior.
> > > > Acquire mmap_sem for writing, split, mark VM_DEAD, drop mmap_sem. Acquire
> > > > mmap_sem for reading, madv_free drop mmap_sem. Acquire mmap_sem for
> > > > writing, free everything left, drop mmap_sem.
> > > >
> > > > ?
> > > >
> > > > Sure, you acquire the lock 3 times, but both write instances should be
> > > > 'short', and I suppose you can do a demote between 1 and 2 if you care.
> > > Thanks, Peter. Yes, by looking the code and trying two different approaches,
> > > it looks this approach is the most straight-forward one.
> > Yes, you just have to be careful about the max vma count limit.
>
> Yes, we should just need copy what do_munmap does as below:
>
> if (end < vma->vm_end && mm->map_count >= sysctl_max_map_count)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> If the mas map count limit has been reached, it will return failure before
> zapping mappings.
Yeah, but as soon as you drop the lock and retake it, somebody might
have changed the adddress space and we might get inconsistency.
So I am wondering whether we really need upgrade_read (to promote read
to write lock) and do the
down_write
split & set up VM_DEAD
downgrade_write
unmap
upgrade_read
zap ptes
up_write
looks terrible, no question about that, but we won't drop the mmap sem
at any time.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-28 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-18 23:34 [RFC v2 0/2] mm: zap pages with read mmap_sem in munmap " Yang Shi
2018-06-18 23:34 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 1/2] uprobes: make vma_has_uprobes non-static Yang Shi
2018-06-18 23:34 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 2/2] mm: mmap: zap pages with read mmap_sem for large mapping Yang Shi
2018-06-19 10:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-19 21:13 ` Yang Shi
2018-06-20 7:17 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-20 16:23 ` Yang Shi
2018-06-19 22:17 ` Nadav Amit
2018-06-19 23:08 ` Yang Shi
2018-06-20 0:31 ` Nadav Amit
2018-06-20 7:18 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-20 17:12 ` Nadav Amit
2018-06-20 18:42 ` Yang Shi
2018-06-23 1:01 ` Yang Shi
2018-06-25 9:14 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-26 0:06 ` Yang Shi
2018-06-26 7:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-27 1:03 ` Yang Shi
2018-06-27 7:24 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-27 17:23 ` Yang Shi
2018-06-28 11:51 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-06-28 19:10 ` Yang Shi
2018-06-29 0:59 ` Yang Shi
2018-06-29 11:39 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-29 16:50 ` Yang Shi
2018-06-29 11:34 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-29 16:45 ` Yang Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180628115101.GE32348@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox