From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f69.google.com (mail-pg0-f69.google.com [74.125.83.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2505E6B000C for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 19:34:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pg0-f69.google.com with SMTP id y13-v6so1339403pgv.10 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:34:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org. [2401:3900:2:1::2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x2-v6si5968143plr.223.2018.06.21.16.34.46 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:34:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:34:21 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memblock: add missing include Message-ID: <20180622093421.6b060710@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20180621180638.ahxpgzwrztopve55@pburton-laptop> References: <20180606194144.16990-1-malat@debian.org> <20180615121716.37fb93385825b0b2f59240cc@linux-foundation.org> <20180621180638.ahxpgzwrztopve55@pburton-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/WC=h_N3UJqTfkjWbdcO478n"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Paul Burton Cc: Andrew Morton , Tony Luck , Mathieu Malaterre , linux-mm@kvack.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List --Sig_/WC=h_N3UJqTfkjWbdcO478n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Paul, On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 11:06:38 -0700 Paul Burton wrote: > > I was expecting to see the original commit, then the revert, then > perhaps a re-application of it but instead it looks like the commits > from master are missing entirely after 25cf23d7a957 ("mm/memblock: print > memblock_remove"). Maybe I'm missing something about the way the merges > for linux-next are done..? Andrew produces his mmotm quilt series and exports it to ozlabs.org from where I fetch it and create the akpm-current and akpm branches in linux-next (and merge them, obviously :-)). The mmotm quilt series has not changed since Jun 15, I assume Andrew is still finalising it. > In any case, could we get the problematic patch removed from linux-next? I have removed it from my copy of mmotm for today. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/WC=h_N3UJqTfkjWbdcO478n Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAlssNf0ACgkQAVBC80lX 0GwqnQgAlpelxvvi6Yhl4qtdIeKBlovkV5kAuzpaae6QMIv0SQi/aiu8PhM8HfRY pZrhXMQl281ZpfKW9pfECeyFbBSXMLrQmlBw2rtFHbIJy25t+AdrToPPDSIiqnWJ JJ6kPJxLzaJ8j4NGL1qdbOh5R3Ast4z1+SxspWAa80aXbZxAokbtuBln5pcLvKWG RpigTqwdlugHIPWYhRixQC3jqc1YbDt3uNq/pvimTNo5y5Aks57oA2dkCLPKTAfi qXhx+67AvvUenF6ajZ51pM8f4agmksmAUg3e2dL0J3xvsLjTJbl/5BQKHj32LZpo VD9hM1JFqNvAja/EiAJ3xwD2E2V4KQ== =NXVc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/WC=h_N3UJqTfkjWbdcO478n--