linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] fs, mm: account buffer_head to kmemcg
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:27:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180619162741.GC27423@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180619051327.149716-4-shakeelb@google.com>

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:13:27PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> The buffer_head can consume a significant amount of system memory and
> is directly related to the amount of page cache. In our production
> environment we have observed that a lot of machines are spending a
> significant amount of memory as buffer_head and can not be left as
> system memory overhead.
> 
> Charging buffer_head is not as simple as adding __GFP_ACCOUNT to the
> allocation. The buffer_heads can be allocated in a memcg different from
> the memcg of the page for which buffer_heads are being allocated. One
> concrete example is memory reclaim. The reclaim can trigger I/O of pages
> of any memcg on the system. So, the right way to charge buffer_head is
> to extract the memcg from the page for which buffer_heads are being
> allocated and then use targeted memcg charging API.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
>  fs/buffer.c                | 14 +++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h |  7 +++++++
>  mm/memcontrol.c            | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
> index 8194e3049fc5..26389b7a3cab 100644
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -815,10 +815,17 @@ struct buffer_head *alloc_page_buffers(struct page *page, unsigned long size,
>  	struct buffer_head *bh, *head;
>  	gfp_t gfp = GFP_NOFS;
>  	long offset;
> +	struct mem_cgroup *old_memcg;
> +	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_page(page);
>  
>  	if (retry)
>  		gfp |= __GFP_NOFAIL;
>  
> +	if (memcg) {
> +		gfp |= __GFP_ACCOUNT;
> +		old_memcg = memalloc_memcg_save(memcg);
> +	}

Please move the get_mem_cgroup_from_page() call out of the
declarations and down to right before the if (memcg) branch.

>  	head = NULL;
>  	offset = PAGE_SIZE;
>  	while ((offset -= size) >= 0) {
> @@ -835,6 +842,11 @@ struct buffer_head *alloc_page_buffers(struct page *page, unsigned long size,
>  		/* Link the buffer to its page */
>  		set_bh_page(bh, page, offset);
>  	}
> +out:
> +	if (memcg) {
> +		memalloc_memcg_restore(old_memcg);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> +		css_put(&memcg->css);
> +#endif

Please add a put_mem_cgroup() ;)

Otherwise this looks fine to me.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-19 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-19  5:13 [PATCH v6 0/3] Directed kmem charging Shakeel Butt
2018-06-19  5:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: memcg: remote memcg charging for kmem allocations Shakeel Butt
2018-06-19 16:24   ` Johannes Weiner
2018-06-19 23:31     ` Shakeel Butt
2018-06-20 15:22       ` Johannes Weiner
2018-06-19  5:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] fs: fsnotify: account fsnotify metadata to kmemcg Shakeel Butt
2018-06-19  7:20   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-06-19 14:15     ` Shakeel Butt
2018-06-19  5:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] fs, mm: account buffer_head " Shakeel Butt
2018-06-19 16:27   ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2018-06-19 17:40     ` Roman Gushchin
2018-06-19 19:51       ` Shakeel Butt
2018-06-19 19:55         ` Roman Gushchin
2018-06-22 23:33           ` Shakeel Butt
2018-06-23  0:05             ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: revert mem_cgroup_put() introduction Roman Gushchin
2018-06-23  0:06               ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: introduce mem_cgroup_put() helper Roman Gushchin
2018-06-23  0:10                 ` Shakeel Butt
2018-06-23  0:47               ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: revert mem_cgroup_put() introduction kbuild test robot
2018-06-19 16:11 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] Directed kmem charging Johannes Weiner
2018-06-19 22:58   ` Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180619162741.GC27423@cmpxchg.org \
    --to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox