From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
tnowicki@caviumnetworks.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, wanghuiqiang@huawei.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
zhongjiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>,
linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: avoid alloc memory on offline node
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 15:08:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180619140818.GA16927@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874lhz3pmn.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 01:52:16PM +0100, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> writes:
>
> > On Tue 19-06-18 20:03:07, Xie XiuQi wrote:
> > [...]
> >> I tested on a arm board with 128 cores 4 numa nodes, but I set CONFIG_NR_CPUS=72.
> >> Then node 3 is not be created, because node 3 has no memory, and no cpu.
> >> But some pci device may related to node 3, which be set in ACPI table.
> >
> > Could you double check that zonelists for node 3 are generated
> > correctly?
>
> The cpus in node 3 aren't onlined and there's no memory attached - I
> suspect that no zonelists are built for this node.
>
> We skip creating a node, if the number of SRAT entries parsed exceeds
> NR_CPUS[0]. This in turn prevents onlining the numa node and so no
> zonelists will be created for it.
>
> I think the problem will go away if the cpus are restricted via the
> kernel command line by setting nr_cpus.
>
> Xie, can you try the below patch on top of the one enabling memoryless
> nodes? I'm not sure this is the right solution but at least it'll
> confirm the problem.
This issue looks familiar (or at least related):
git log d3bd058826aa
The reason why the NR_CPUS guard is there is to avoid overflowing
the early_node_cpu_hwid array. IA64 does something different in
that respect compared to x86, we have to have a look into this.
Regardless, AFAICS the proximity domains to nodes mappings should not
depend on CONFIG_NR_CPUS, it seems that there is something wrong in that
in ARM64 ACPI SRAT parsing.
Lorenzo
>
> Thanks,
> Punit
>
> [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c?h=v4.18-rc1#n73
>
> -- >8 --
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> index d190a7b231bf..fea0f7164f1a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> @@ -70,11 +70,9 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa)
> if (!(pa->flags & ACPI_SRAT_GICC_ENABLED))
> return;
>
> - if (cpus_in_srat >= NR_CPUS) {
> + if (cpus_in_srat >= NR_CPUS)
> pr_warn_once("SRAT: cpu_to_node_map[%d] is too small, may not be able to use all cpus\n",
> NR_CPUS);
> - return;
> - }
>
> pxm = pa->proximity_domain;
> node = acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-19 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1527768879-88161-1-git-send-email-xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
[not found] ` <1527768879-88161-2-git-send-email-xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
[not found] ` <20180606154516.GL6631@arm.com>
2018-06-06 20:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-06-07 10:55 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-07 11:55 ` Hanjun Guo
2018-06-07 12:21 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-11 3:23 ` Xie XiuQi
2018-06-11 8:52 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-11 12:32 ` Xie XiuQi
2018-06-11 13:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-06-11 14:53 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-12 15:08 ` Punit Agrawal
2018-06-12 15:20 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-13 17:39 ` Punit Agrawal
2018-06-14 6:23 ` Hanjun Guo
2018-06-19 12:03 ` Xie XiuQi
2018-06-19 12:07 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-19 12:40 ` Xie XiuQi
2018-06-19 12:52 ` Punit Agrawal
2018-06-19 14:08 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2018-06-19 14:54 ` Punit Agrawal
2018-06-19 15:14 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-19 15:35 ` Punit Agrawal
2018-06-19 16:32 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-06-20 3:31 ` Xie XiuQi
2018-06-20 11:51 ` Punit Agrawal
2018-06-22 8:58 ` Hanjun Guo
2018-06-22 9:11 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-22 10:24 ` Punit Agrawal
2018-06-22 17:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-06-26 17:27 ` Punit Agrawal
2018-06-26 17:27 ` Punit Agrawal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180619140818.GA16927@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tnowicki@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=wanghuiqiang@huawei.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
--cc=zhongjiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox