From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl0-f71.google.com (mail-pl0-f71.google.com [209.85.160.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90996B026F for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 04:38:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pl0-f71.google.com with SMTP id e1-v6so9708339pld.23 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 01:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org. [140.211.169.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j6-v6si14530040pll.54.2018.06.18.01.38.10 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Jun 2018 01:38:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: [PATCH 4.14 159/189] x86/pkeys/selftests: Factor out "instruction page" Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 10:14:15 +0200 Message-Id: <20180618081215.617261351@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20180618081209.254234434@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180618081209.254234434@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen , Andrew Morton , Dave Hansen , Linus Torvalds , Michael Ellermen , Peter Zijlstra , Ram Pai , Shuah Khan , Thomas Gleixner , linux-mm@kvack.org, Ingo Molnar , Sasha Levin 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Dave Hansen [ Upstream commit 3fcd2b2d928904cbf30b01e2c5e4f1dd2f9ab262 ] We currently have an execute-only test, but it is for the explicit mprotect_pkey() interface. We will soon add a test for the implicit mprotect(PROT_EXEC) enterface. We need this code in both tests. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Michael Ellermen Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ram Pai Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171347.C64AB733@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c @@ -1253,12 +1253,9 @@ void test_ptrace_of_child(int *ptr, u16 free(plain_ptr_unaligned); } -void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey) +void *get_pointer_to_instructions(void) { void *p1; - int scratch; - int ptr_contents; - int ret; p1 = ALIGN_PTR_UP(&lots_o_noops_around_write, PAGE_SIZE); dprintf3("&lots_o_noops: %p\n", &lots_o_noops_around_write); @@ -1268,7 +1265,23 @@ void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory /* Point 'p1' at the *second* page of the function: */ p1 += PAGE_SIZE; + /* + * Try to ensure we fault this in on next touch to ensure + * we get an instruction fault as opposed to a data one + */ madvise(p1, PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED); + + return p1; +} + +void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey) +{ + void *p1; + int scratch; + int ptr_contents; + int ret; + + p1 = get_pointer_to_instructions(); lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch); ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1); dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);