From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f72.google.com (mail-lf0-f72.google.com [209.85.215.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11106B0003 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2018 06:20:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lf0-f72.google.com with SMTP id m9-v6so4897326lfb.15 for ; Sat, 09 Jun 2018 03:20:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-sor-f65.google.com (mail-sor-f65.google.com. [209.85.220.65]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id a75-v6sor3077977lfb.19.2018.06.09.03.20.30 for (Google Transport Security); Sat, 09 Jun 2018 03:20:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2018 13:20:27 +0300 From: Vladimir Davydov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: fix race between kmem_cache destroy, create and deactivate Message-ID: <20180609102027.5vkqucnzvh6nfdxu@esperanza> References: <20180530001204.183758-1-shakeelb@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180530001204.183758-1-shakeelb@google.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Shakeel Butt Cc: Michal Hocko , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , Greg Thelen , Johannes Weiner , Tejun Heo , Linux MM , Cgroups , LKML On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 05:12:04PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote: > The memcg kmem cache creation and deactivation (SLUB only) is > asynchronous. If a root kmem cache is destroyed whose memcg cache is in > the process of creation or deactivation, the kernel may crash. > > Example of one such crash: > general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI > CPU: 1 PID: 1721 Comm: kworker/14:1 Not tainted 4.17.0-smp > ... > Workqueue: memcg_kmem_cache kmemcg_deactivate_workfn > RIP: 0010:has_cpu_slab > ... > Call Trace: > ? on_each_cpu_cond > __kmem_cache_shrink > kmemcg_cache_deact_after_rcu > kmemcg_deactivate_workfn > process_one_work > worker_thread > kthread > ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 > > To fix this race, on root kmem cache destruction, mark the cache as > dying and flush the workqueue used for memcg kmem cache creation and > deactivation. > @@ -845,6 +862,8 @@ void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *s) > if (unlikely(!s)) > return; > > + flush_memcg_workqueue(s); > + This should definitely help against async memcg_kmem_cache_create(), but I'm afraid it doesn't eliminate the race with async destruction, unfortunately, because the latter uses call_rcu_sched(): memcg_deactivate_kmem_caches __kmem_cache_deactivate slab_deactivate_memcg_cache_rcu_sched call_rcu_sched kmem_cache_destroy shutdown_memcg_caches shutdown_cache memcg_deactivate_rcufn Can we somehow flush those pending rcu requests?