From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@intel.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] x86/cet: Control protection exception handler
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 12:17:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201806081200.u9Nosudv%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180607143705.3531-2-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4628 bytes --]
Hi Yu-cheng,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on asm-generic/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.17 next-20180607]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/core mmotm/master]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Yu-cheng-Yu/Control-Flow-Enforcement-Part-2/20180608-111152
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/asm-generic.git master
config: i386-randconfig-a0-201822 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-4.9 (Debian 4.9.4-2) 4.9.4
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:53:0,
from include/linux/thread_info.h:38,
from arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:7,
from include/linux/preempt.h:81,
from include/linux/rcupdate.h:40,
from include/linux/rculist.h:11,
from include/linux/pid.h:5,
from include/linux/sched.h:14,
from include/linux/context_tracking.h:5,
from arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:15:
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c: In function 'do_control_protection':
>> arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:605:27: error: 'X86_FEATURE_SHSTK' undeclared (first use in this function)
if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) &&
^
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:127:24: note: in definition of macro 'cpu_feature_enabled'
(__builtin_constant_p(bit) && DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET(bit) ? 0 : static_cpu_has(bit))
^
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:605:27: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) &&
^
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:127:24: note: in definition of macro 'cpu_feature_enabled'
(__builtin_constant_p(bit) && DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET(bit) ? 0 : static_cpu_has(bit))
^
>> arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:606:27: error: 'X86_FEATURE_IBT' undeclared (first use in this function)
!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_IBT)) {
^
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:127:24: note: in definition of macro 'cpu_feature_enabled'
(__builtin_constant_p(bit) && DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET(bit) ? 0 : static_cpu_has(bit))
^
vim +/X86_FEATURE_SHSTK +605 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
589
590 /*
591 * When a control protection exception occurs, send a signal
592 * to the responsible application. Currently, control
593 * protection is only enabled for the user mode. This
594 * exception should not come from the kernel mode.
595 */
596 dotraplinkage void
597 do_control_protection(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
598 {
599 struct task_struct *tsk;
600
601 RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(), "entry code didn't wake RCU");
602 cond_local_irq_enable(regs);
603
604 tsk = current;
> 605 if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) &&
> 606 !cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_IBT)) {
607 goto exit;
608 }
609
610 if (!user_mode(regs)) {
611 tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
612 tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_CP;
613 if (notify_die(DIE_TRAP, "control protection fault", regs,
614 error_code, X86_TRAP_CP, SIGSEGV) != NOTIFY_STOP)
615 die("control protection fault", regs, error_code);
616 return;
617 }
618
619 tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
620 tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_CP;
621
622 if (show_unhandled_signals && unhandled_signal(tsk, SIGSEGV) &&
623 printk_ratelimit()) {
624 unsigned int max_idx, err_idx;
625
626 max_idx = ARRAY_SIZE(control_protection_err) - 1;
627 err_idx = min((unsigned int)error_code - 1, max_idx);
628 pr_info("%s[%d] control protection ip:%lx sp:%lx error:%lx(%s)",
629 tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk),
630 regs->ip, regs->sp, error_code,
631 control_protection_err[err_idx]);
632 print_vma_addr(" in ", regs->ip);
633 pr_cont("\n");
634 }
635
636 exit:
637 force_sig_info(SIGSEGV, SEND_SIG_PRIV, tsk);
638 }
639 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(do_control_protection);
640
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 29261 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-08 4:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-07 14:36 [PATCH 0/9] Control Flow Enforcement - Part (2) Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 14:36 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86/cet: Control protection exception handler Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 15:46 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 16:23 ` Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-08 4:17 ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2018-06-08 4:18 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-07 14:36 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86/cet: Add Kconfig option for user-mode shadow stack Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 15:47 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 15:58 ` Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 16:28 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 14:36 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm: Introduce VM_SHSTK for shadow stack memory Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/mm: Change _PAGE_DIRTY to _PAGE_DIRTY_HW Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-08 3:53 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/mm: Introduce _PAGE_DIRTY_SW Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-08 5:15 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/mm: Introduce ptep_set_wrprotect_flush and related functions Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 16:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 18:21 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-07 18:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 20:29 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-07 20:36 ` Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-08 0:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-08 1:20 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-08 4:43 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-08 14:13 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/mm: Shadow stack page fault error checking Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 16:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 16:46 ` Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 16:56 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/cet: Handle shadow stack page fault Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/cet: Handle THP/HugeTLB shadow stack page copying Yu-cheng Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201806081200.u9Nosudv%fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vedvyas.shanbhogue@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox