linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
	Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@intel.com>,
	"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] x86/mm: Introduce _PAGE_DIRTY_SW
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 13:15:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201806081116.rrbqmKdo%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180607143705.3531-6-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6964 bytes --]

Hi Yu-cheng,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on asm-generic/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.17 next-20180607]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/core mmotm/master]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Yu-cheng-Yu/Control-Flow-Enforcement-Part-2/20180608-111152
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/asm-generic.git master
config: i386-randconfig-x003-201822 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=i386 

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:5:0,
                    from include/linux/sched.h:12,
                    from include/linux/context_tracking.h:5,
                    from arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:15:
   arch/x86/kernel/traps.c: In function 'do_control_protection':
   arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:605:27: error: 'X86_FEATURE_SHSTK' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'X86_FEATURE_EST'?
     if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) &&
                              ^
   include/linux/compiler.h:58:30: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
     if (__builtin_constant_p(!!(cond)) ? !!(cond) :   \
                                 ^~~~
>> arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:605:2: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
     if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) &&
     ^~
>> arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:605:7: note: in expansion of macro 'cpu_feature_enabled'
     if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) &&
          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:605:27: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
     if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) &&
                              ^
   include/linux/compiler.h:58:30: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
     if (__builtin_constant_p(!!(cond)) ? !!(cond) :   \
                                 ^~~~
>> arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:605:2: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
     if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) &&
     ^~
>> arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:605:7: note: in expansion of macro 'cpu_feature_enabled'
     if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) &&
          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:606:27: error: 'X86_FEATURE_IBT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'X86_FEATURE_IBS'?
         !cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_IBT)) {
                              ^
   include/linux/compiler.h:58:30: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if'
     if (__builtin_constant_p(!!(cond)) ? !!(cond) :   \
                                 ^~~~
>> arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:605:2: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
     if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) &&
     ^~
   arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:606:7: note: in expansion of macro 'cpu_feature_enabled'
         !cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_IBT)) {
          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

vim +/if +605 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c

a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  589  
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  590  /*
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  591   * When a control protection exception occurs, send a signal
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  592   * to the responsible application.  Currently, control
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  593   * protection is only enabled for the user mode.  This
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  594   * exception should not come from the kernel mode.
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  595   */
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  596  dotraplinkage void
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  597  do_control_protection(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  598  {
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  599  	struct task_struct *tsk;
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  600  
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  601  	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(), "entry code didn't wake RCU");
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  602  	cond_local_irq_enable(regs);
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  603  
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  604  	tsk = current;
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07 @605  	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) &&
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  606  	    !cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_IBT)) {
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  607  		goto exit;
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  608  	}
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  609  
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  610  	if (!user_mode(regs)) {
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  611  		tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  612  		tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_CP;
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  613  		if (notify_die(DIE_TRAP, "control protection fault", regs,
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  614  			       error_code, X86_TRAP_CP, SIGSEGV) != NOTIFY_STOP)
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  615  			die("control protection fault", regs, error_code);
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  616  		return;
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  617  	}
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  618  
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  619  	tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  620  	tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_CP;
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  621  
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  622  	if (show_unhandled_signals && unhandled_signal(tsk, SIGSEGV) &&
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  623  	    printk_ratelimit()) {
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  624  		unsigned int max_idx, err_idx;
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  625  
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  626  		max_idx = ARRAY_SIZE(control_protection_err) - 1;
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  627  		err_idx = min((unsigned int)error_code - 1, max_idx);
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  628  		pr_info("%s[%d] control protection ip:%lx sp:%lx error:%lx(%s)",
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  629  			tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk),
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  630  			regs->ip, regs->sp, error_code,
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  631  			control_protection_err[err_idx]);
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  632  		print_vma_addr(" in ", regs->ip);
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  633  		pr_cont("\n");
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  634  	}
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  635  
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  636  exit:
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  637  	force_sig_info(SIGSEGV, SEND_SIG_PRIV, tsk);
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  638  }
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  639  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(do_control_protection);
a74a6de2 Yu-cheng Yu 2018-06-07  640  

:::::: The code at line 605 was first introduced by commit
:::::: a74a6de2a3290257798598ae1f816eddb04f63f2 x86/cet: Control protection exception handler

:::::: TO: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
:::::: CC: 0day robot <lkp@intel.com>

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 33603 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-08  5:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-07 14:36 [PATCH 0/9] Control Flow Enforcement - Part (2) Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 14:36 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86/cet: Control protection exception handler Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 15:46   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 16:23     ` Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-08  4:17   ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-08  4:18   ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-07 14:36 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86/cet: Add Kconfig option for user-mode shadow stack Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 15:47   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 15:58     ` Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 16:28       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 14:36 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm: Introduce VM_SHSTK for shadow stack memory Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/mm: Change _PAGE_DIRTY to _PAGE_DIRTY_HW Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-08  3:53   ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/mm: Introduce _PAGE_DIRTY_SW Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-08  5:15   ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/mm: Introduce ptep_set_wrprotect_flush and related functions Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 16:24   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 18:21     ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-07 18:24       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 20:29     ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-07 20:36       ` Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-08  0:59       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-08  1:20         ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-08  4:43   ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-08 14:13   ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/mm: Shadow stack page fault error checking Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 16:26   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 16:46     ` Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 16:56     ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/cet: Handle shadow stack page fault Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/cet: Handle THP/HugeTLB shadow stack page copying Yu-cheng Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201806081116.rrbqmKdo%fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vedvyas.shanbhogue@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox