From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@intel.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] x86/cet: Add Kconfig option for user-mode shadow stack
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 07:36:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180607143705.3531-3-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180607143705.3531-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Introduce Kconfig option X86_INTEL_SHADOW_STACK_USER.
An application has shadow stack protection when all the following are
true:
(1) The kernel has X86_INTEL_SHADOW_STACK_USER enabled,
(2) The running processor supports the shadow stack,
(3) The application is built with shadow stack enabled tools & libs
and, and at runtime, all dependent shared libs can support shadow
stack.
If this kernel config option is enabled, but (2) or (3) above is not
true, the application runs without the shadow stack protection.
Existing legacy applications will continue to work without the shadow
stack protection.
The user-mode shadow stack protection is only implemented for the
64-bit kernel. Thirty-two bit applications are supported under the
compatibility mode.
Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index c07f492b871a..dd580d4910fc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -1925,6 +1925,30 @@ config X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
If unsure, say y.
+config X86_INTEL_CET
+ def_bool n
+
+config ARCH_HAS_SHSTK
+ def_bool n
+
+config X86_INTEL_SHADOW_STACK_USER
+ prompt "Intel Shadow Stack for user-mode"
+ def_bool n
+ depends on CPU_SUP_INTEL && X86_64
+ select X86_INTEL_CET
+ select ARCH_HAS_SHSTK
+ ---help---
+ Shadow stack provides hardware protection against program stack
+ corruption. Only when all the following are true will an application
+ have the shadow stack protection: the kernel supports it (i.e. this
+ feature is enabled), the application is compiled and linked with
+ shadow stack enabled, and the processor supports this feature.
+ When the kernel has this configuration enabled, existing non shadow
+ stack applications will continue to work, but without shadow stack
+ protection.
+
+ If unsure, say y.
+
config EFI
bool "EFI runtime service support"
depends on ACPI
--
2.15.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-07 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-07 14:36 [PATCH 0/9] Control Flow Enforcement - Part (2) Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 14:36 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86/cet: Control protection exception handler Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 15:46 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 16:23 ` Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-08 4:17 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-08 4:18 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-07 14:36 ` Yu-cheng Yu [this message]
2018-06-07 15:47 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86/cet: Add Kconfig option for user-mode shadow stack Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 15:58 ` Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 16:28 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 14:36 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm: Introduce VM_SHSTK for shadow stack memory Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/mm: Change _PAGE_DIRTY to _PAGE_DIRTY_HW Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-08 3:53 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/mm: Introduce _PAGE_DIRTY_SW Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-08 5:15 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/mm: Introduce ptep_set_wrprotect_flush and related functions Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 16:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 18:21 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-07 18:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 20:29 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-07 20:36 ` Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-08 0:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-08 1:20 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-08 4:43 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-08 14:13 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/mm: Shadow stack page fault error checking Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 16:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 16:46 ` Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 16:56 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/cet: Handle shadow stack page fault Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/cet: Handle THP/HugeTLB shadow stack page copying Yu-cheng Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180607143705.3531-3-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
--to=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vedvyas.shanbhogue@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox