From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl0-f72.google.com (mail-pl0-f72.google.com [209.85.160.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526DA6B0007 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 03:26:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pl0-f72.google.com with SMTP id 31-v6so14880095plf.19 for ; Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:26:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com. [192.55.52.93]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v18-v6si39065055plo.285.2018.06.01.00.26.05 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:26:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 15:26:04 +0800 From: Aaron Lu Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [mm, memcontrol] 309fe96bfc: vm-scalability.throughput +23.0% improvement Message-ID: <20180601072604.GB27302@intel.com> References: <20180528114019.GF9904@yexl-desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180528114019.GF9904@yexl-desktop> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: kernel test robot Cc: Tejun Heo , lkp@01.org, LKML , Michal Hocko , linux-mm@kvack.org On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 07:40:19PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > Greeting, > > FYI, we noticed a +23.0% improvement of vm-scalability.throughput due to commit: > > > commit: 309fe96bfc0ae387f53612927a8f0dc3eb056efd ("mm, memcontrol: implement memory.swap.events") > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master > > in testcase: vm-scalability > on test machine: 144 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8890 v3 @ 2.50GHz with 512G memory > with following parameters: > > runtime: 300s > size: 1T > test: lru-shm > cpufreq_governor: performance > > test-description: The motivation behind this suite is to exercise functions and regions of the mm/ of the Linux kernel which are of interest to us. > test-url: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/vm-scalability.git/ > With the patch I just sent out: "mem_cgroup: make sure moving_account, move_lock_task and stat_cpu in the same cacheline" Applying this commit on top doesn't yield 23% improvement any more, but a 6% performace drop... I found the culprit being the following one line introduced in this commit: diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index d90b0201a8c4..07ab974c0a49 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -6019,13 +6019,17 @@ int mem_cgroup_try_charge_swap(struct page *page, swp_entry_t entry) if (!memcg) return 0; - if (!entry.val) + if (!entry.val) { + memcg_memory_event(memcg, MEMCG_SWAP_FAIL); return 0; + } memcg = mem_cgroup_id_get_online(memcg); If I remove that memcg_memory_event() call, performance will restore. It's beyond my understanding why this code path matters since there is no swap device setup in the test machine so I don't see how possible get_swap_page() could ever be called. Still investigating...