linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
	malat@debian.org, dvyukov@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	catalin marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmemleak: don't use __GFP_NOFAIL
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 14:38:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180530123826.GF27180@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1684479370.5483281.1527680579781.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>

On Wed 30-05-18 07:42:59, Chunyu Hu wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>
> > To: "Chunyu Hu" <chuhu@redhat.com>
> > Cc: "Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>, malat@debian.org, dvyukov@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
> > "catalin marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 6:46:37 PM
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmemleak: don't use __GFP_NOFAIL
> > 
> > On Wed 30-05-18 05:35:37, Chunyu Hu wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I'm trying to reuse the make_it_fail field in task for fault injection. As
> > > adding
> > > an extra memory alloc flag is not thought so good,  I think adding task
> > > flag
> > > is either?
> > 
> > Yeah, task flag will be reduced to KMEMLEAK enabled configurations
> > without an additional maint. overhead. Anyway, you should really think
> > about how to guarantee trackability for atomic allocation requests. You
> > cannot simply assume that GFP_NOWAIT will succeed. I guess you really
> 
> Sure. While I'm using task->make_it_fail, I'm still in the direction of 
> making kmemleak avoid fault inject with task flag instead of page alloc flag.
> 
> > want to have a pre-populated pool of objects for those requests. The
> > obvious question is how to balance such a pool. It ain't easy to track
> > memory by allocating more memory...
> 
> This solution is going to make kmemleak trace really nofail. We can think
> later.
> 
> while I'm thinking about if fault inject can be disabled via flag in task.
> 
> Actually, I'm doing something like below, the disable_fault_inject() is
> just setting a flag in task->make_it_fail. But this will depend on if
> fault injection accept a change like this. CCing Akinobu 

You still seem to be missing my point I am afraid (or I am ;). So say
that you want to track a GFP_NOWAIT allocation request. So create_object
will get called with that gfp mask and no matter what you try here your
tracking object will be allocated in a weak allocation context as well
and disable kmemleak. So it only takes a more heavy memory pressure and
the tracing is gone...
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-30 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-26  7:14 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 21 at ../mm/page_alloc.c:4258 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0xa88/0xfec Mathieu Malaterre
2018-05-28  8:34 ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-28 13:05   ` [PATCH] kmemleak: don't use __GFP_NOFAIL Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-28 13:24     ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-28 21:05       ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-29 13:27         ` Chunyu Hu
2018-05-29 13:46           ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-05-30  9:35             ` Chunyu Hu
2018-05-30 10:46               ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-30 11:42                 ` Chunyu Hu
2018-05-30 12:38                   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-05-31 10:51                     ` Chunyu Hu
2018-05-31 11:35                       ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-31 12:28                         ` Chunyu Hu
2018-05-31 15:22                     ` Catalin Marinas
2018-05-31 18:41                       ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-01  1:50                         ` Chunyu Hu
2018-06-01  4:53                           ` Chunyu Hu
2018-06-04  8:41                             ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-06-04 12:42                               ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-04 15:08                                 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-06-04 15:36                                   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-06-04 16:41                                     ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180530123826.GF27180@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chuhu@redhat.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=malat@debian.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox