Re: [PATCH] kmemleak: don't use __GFP_NOFAIL

[Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>]

Michal Hocko wrote:
> I've found the previous report [1] finally. Adding Chunyu Hu to the CC
> list. The report which triggered this one is [2]
> 
> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1524243513-29118-1-git-send-email-chuhu@redhat.com
> [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+7wUswp_Sr=hHqi1bwRZ3FE2wY5ozZWZ8Z1BgrFnSAmijUKjA@mail.gmail.com
> 
> I am not really familiar with the kmemleak code but the expectation that
> you can make a forward progress in an unknown allocation context seems
> broken to me. Why kmemleak cannot pre-allocate a pool of object_cache
> and refill it from a reasonably strong contexts (e.g. in a sleepable
> context)?

Or, we can undo the original allocation if the kmemleak allocation failed?

kmalloc(size, gfp) {
  ptr = do_kmalloc(size, gfp);
  if (ptr) {
    object = do_kmalloc(size, gfp_kmemleak_mask(gfp));
    if (!object) {
      kfree(ptr);
      return NULL;
    }
    // Store information of ptr into object.
  }
  return ptr;
}