linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Timofey Titovets <nefelim4ag@gmail.com>
Cc: pasha.tatashin@oracle.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Sioh Lee <solee@os.korea.ac.kr>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/2 RESEND] ksm: replace jhash2 with faster hash
Date: Sun, 27 May 2018 16:03:26 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180527130325.GB4522@rapoport-lnx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGqmi76-qK9q_OTvyqpb-9k_m0CLMt3o860uaN5LL8nBkf5RTg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:01:20AM +0300, Timofey Titovets wrote:
> N?N?, 23 D 1/4 D?N? 2018 D3. D2 17:24, Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>:
> 
> > Hi Timofey,

[ ... ]
 
> > It really feels wrong to keep  choice_fastest_hash() in fasthash(), it is
> > done only once and really belongs to the init function, like ksm_init().
> As
> 
> That possible to move decision from lazy load, to ksm_thread,
> that will allow us to start bench and not slowdown boot.
> 
> But for that to works, ksm must start later, after init of crypto.
 
What about moving choice_fastest_hash() to run_store()?

KSM anyway starts with ksm_run = KSM_RUN_STOP and does not scan until
userspace writes !0 to /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/run.

Selection of the hash function when KSM is actually enabled seems quite
appropriate...

> > I understand, you think it is a bad idea to keep it in ksm_init() because
> > it slows down boot by 0.25s, which I agree with your is substantial. But,
> I
> > really do not think that we should spend those 0.25s at all deciding what
> > hash function is optimal, and instead default to one or another during
> boot
> > based on hardware we are booting on. If crc32c without hw acceleration is
> > no worse than jhash2, maybe we should simply switch to  crc32c?
> 
> crc32c with no hw, are slower in compare to jhash2 on x86, so i think on
> other arches result will be same.
> 
> > Thank you,
> > Pavel
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --
> Have a nice day,
> Timofey.
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-27 13:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-18 19:32 [PATCH V6 0/2 RESEND] KSM replace hash algo " Timofey Titovets
2018-04-18 19:32 ` [PATCH V6 1/2 RESEND] xxHash: create arch dependent 32/64-bit xxhash() Timofey Titovets
2018-04-18 19:32 ` [PATCH V6 2/2 RESEND] ksm: replace jhash2 with faster hash Timofey Titovets
2018-05-08 15:26   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2018-05-11 23:06     ` Timofey Titovets
2018-05-14 10:17       ` Claudio Imbrenda
2018-05-16 10:26         ` Timofey Titovets
2018-05-22 20:22   ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-05-23 13:45     ` Timofey Titovets
2018-05-23 14:24       ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-05-24  8:01         ` Timofey Titovets
2018-05-25  1:16           ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-05-26 20:25             ` [PATCH] " kbuild test robot
2018-05-26 21:06             ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-27 13:03           ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2018-05-29 14:45             ` [PATCH V6 2/2 RESEND] " Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-07  8:58               ` Timofey Titovets
2018-06-07 11:52                 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-06-08  1:29                   ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-10  5:38                     ` Mike Rapoport
2018-06-22 18:48                       ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-25  8:48                     ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-13 10:35                       ` Timofey Titovets
2018-09-13 18:01                         ` Mike Rapoport
2018-09-13 18:10                           ` Pasha Tatashin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-02-07 10:22 [PATCH V6 0/2 RESEND] KSM replace hash algo " Timofey Titovets
2018-02-07 10:22 ` [PATCH V6 2/2 RESEND] ksm: replace jhash2 " Timofey Titovets

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180527130325.GB4522@rapoport-lnx \
    --to=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nefelim4ag@gmail.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
    --cc=solee@os.korea.ac.kr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox