From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f71.google.com (mail-wm0-f71.google.com [74.125.82.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB6D6B0005 for ; Thu, 24 May 2018 02:29:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f71.google.com with SMTP id e26-v6so493956wmh.7 for ; Wed, 23 May 2018 23:29:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de. [213.95.11.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k184-v6si2824279wmk.47.2018.05.23.23.29.37 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 23 May 2018 23:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 08:35:07 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] mm: rework hmm to use devm_memremap_pages Message-ID: <20180524063507.GA9750@lst.de> References: <152694211402.5484.2277538346144115181.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20180524001026.GA3527@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dan Williams Cc: Jerome Glisse , Andrew Morton , stable , Logan Gunthorpe , Christoph Hellwig , Michal Hocko , Linux MM , Linux Kernel Mailing List On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 08:18:11PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 03:35:14PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, please consider this series for 4.18. > >> > >> For maintainability, as ZONE_DEVICE continues to attract new users, > >> it is useful to keep all users consolidated on devm_memremap_pages() as > >> the interface for create "device pages". > >> > >> The devm_memremap_pages() implementation was recently reworked to make > >> it more generic for arbitrary users, like the proposed peer-to-peer > >> PCI-E enabling. HMM pre-dated this rework and opted to duplicate > >> devm_memremap_pages() as hmm_devmem_pages_create(). > >> > >> Rework HMM to be a consumer of devm_memremap_pages() directly and fix up > >> the licensing on the exports given the deep dependencies on the mm. > > > > I am on PTO right now so i won't be able to quickly review it all > > but forcing GPL export is problematic for me now. I rather have > > device driver using "sane" common helpers than creating their own > > crazy thing. > > Sane drivers that need this level of deep integration with Linux > memory management need to be upstream. Otherwise, HMM is an > unprecedented departure from the norms of Linux kernel development. Agreed. I consider every driver using this a derived work, independ on the marking or not. And I'm willing to enforce this.