From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f71.google.com (mail-wm0-f71.google.com [74.125.82.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5694C6B0006 for ; Wed, 23 May 2018 05:26:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f71.google.com with SMTP id a127-v6so1988322wmh.6 for ; Wed, 23 May 2018 02:26:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x58-v6si3352820edx.338.2018.05.23.02.26.30 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 23 May 2018 02:26:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 11:26:28 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [RFC] trace when adding memory to an offline nod Message-ID: <20180523092628.GM20441@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20180523080108.GA30350@techadventures.net> <20180523083756.GJ20441@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180523084342.GK20441@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180523091914.GA31306@techadventures.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180523091914.GA31306@techadventures.net> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Oscar Salvador Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, vbabka@suse.cz, pasha.tatashin@oracle.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com On Wed 23-05-18 11:19:14, Oscar Salvador wrote: [...] > For what is worth it: > > Tested-by: Oscar Salvador Thanks for testing. I will repost with the other issue you have noticed. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs