From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: ufo19890607 <ufo19890607@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, rientjes@google.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, guro@fb.com,
yang.s@alibaba-inc.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yuzhoujian <yuzhoujian@didichuxing.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add the memcg print oom info for system oom
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 09:11:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180517071140.GQ12670@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1526540428-12178-1-git-send-email-ufo19890607@gmail.com>
On Thu 17-05-18 08:00:28, ufo19890607 wrote:
> From: yuzhoujian <yuzhoujian@didichuxing.com>
>
> The dump_header does not print the memcg's name when the system
> oom happened. Some users want to locate the certain container
> which contains the task that has been killed by the oom killer.
> So I add the mem_cgroup_print_oom_info when system oom events
> happened.
The oom report is quite heavy today. Do we really need the full memcg
oom report here. Wouldn't it be sufficient to print the memcg the task
belongs to?
> Signed-off-by: yuzhoujian <yuzhoujian@didichuxing.com>
> ---
> mm/oom_kill.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index 8ba6cb88cf58..244416c9834a 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -433,6 +433,7 @@ static void dump_header(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p)
> if (is_memcg_oom(oc))
> mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(oc->memcg, p);
> else {
> + mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(mem_cgroup_from_task(p), p);
> show_mem(SHOW_MEM_FILTER_NODES, oc->nodemask);
> if (is_dump_unreclaim_slabs())
> dump_unreclaimable_slab();
> --
> 2.14.1
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-17 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-17 7:00 ufo19890607
2018-05-17 7:11 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-05-17 9:44 ` 禹舟键
2018-05-17 10:23 ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-17 10:42 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-05-21 21:11 ` David Rientjes
2018-05-22 6:37 ` Michal Hocko
2018-05-22 22:54 ` David Rientjes
2018-05-19 21:18 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180517071140.GQ12670@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=ufo19890607@gmail.com \
--cc=yang.s@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=yuzhoujian@didichuxing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox