From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Huaisheng HS1 Ye <yehs1@lenovo.com>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"mhocko@suse.com" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"vbabka@suse.cz" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"mgorman@techsingularity.net" <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
"alexander.levin@verizon.com" <alexander.levin@verizon.com>,
"colyli@suse.de" <colyli@suse.de>,
NingTing Cheng <chengnt@lenovo.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v1] include/linux/gfp.h: getting rid of GFP_ZONE_TABLE/BAD
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 06:26:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180511132613.GA30263@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <HK2PR03MB16843E14AD56B3E546D9F52D929F0@HK2PR03MB1684.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 03:24:34AM +0000, Huaisheng HS1 Ye wrote:
> > From: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org [mailto:owner-linux-mm@kvack.org] On Behalf Of Matthew
> > Wilcox
> > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:10:25AM +0800, Huaisheng Ye wrote:
> > > -#define __GFP_DMA ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_DMA)
> > > -#define __GFP_HIGHMEM ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_HIGHMEM)
> > > -#define __GFP_DMA32 ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_DMA32)
> > > +#define __GFP_DMA ((__force gfp_t)OPT_ZONE_DMA ^ ZONE_NORMAL)
> > > +#define __GFP_HIGHMEM ((__force gfp_t)ZONE_MOVABLE ^ ZONE_NORMAL)
> > > +#define __GFP_DMA32 ((__force gfp_t)OPT_ZONE_DMA32 ^ ZONE_NORMAL)
> >
> > No, you've made gfp_zone even more complex than it already is.
> > If you can't use OPT_ZONE_HIGHMEM here, then this is a waste of time.
> >
> Dear Matthew,
>
> The reason why I don't use OPT_ZONE_HIGHMEM for __GFP_HIGHMEM directly is that, for x86_64 platform there is no CONFIG_HIGHMEM, so OPT_ZONE_HIGHMEM shall always be equal to ZONE_NORMAL.
Right. On 64-bit platforms, if somebody asks for HIGHMEM, they should
get NORMAL pages.
> For gfp_zone it is impossible to distinguish the meaning of lowest 3 bits in flags. How can gfp_zone to understand it comes from OPT_ZONE_HIGHMEM or ZONE_NORMAL?
> And the most pained thing is that, if __GFP_HIGHMEM with movable flag enabled, it means that ZONE_MOVABLE shall be returned.
> That is different from ZONE_DMA, ZONE_DMA32 and ZONE_NORMAL.
The point of this exercise is to actually encode the zone number in
the bottom bits of the GFP flags instead of something which has to be
interpreted into a zone number. When somebody sets __GFP_MOVABLE, they
should also be setting ZONE_MOVABLE:
-#define __GFP_MOVABLE ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_MOVABLE) /* ZONE_MOVABLE allowed */
+#define __GFP_MOVABLE ((__force gfp_t)(___GFP_MOVABLE | (ZONE_MOVABLE ^ ZONE_NORMAL)))
One thing that does need to change is:
-#define GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE (GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_MOVABLE)
+#define GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE (GFP_USER | __GFP_MOVABLE)
otherwise we'll be OR'ing ZONE_MOVABLE and ZONE_HIGHMEM together.
> I was thinking...
> Whether it is possible to use other judgement condition to decide OPT_ZONE_HIGHMEM or ZONE_MOVABLE shall be returned from gfp_zone.
>
> Sincerely,
> Huaisheng Ye
>
>
> > > static inline enum zone_type gfp_zone(gfp_t flags)
> > > {
> > > enum zone_type z;
> > > - int bit = (__force int) (flags & GFP_ZONEMASK);
> > > + z = ((__force unsigned int)flags & ___GFP_ZONE_MASK) ^ ZONE_NORMAL;
> > > +
> > > + if (z > OPT_ZONE_HIGHMEM)
> > > + z = OPT_ZONE_HIGHMEM +
> > > + !!((__force unsigned int)flags & ___GFP_MOVABLE);
> > >
> > > - z = (GFP_ZONE_TABLE >> (bit * GFP_ZONES_SHIFT)) &
> > > - ((1 << GFP_ZONES_SHIFT) - 1);
> > > - VM_BUG_ON((GFP_ZONE_BAD >> bit) & 1);
> > > + VM_BUG_ON(z > ZONE_MOVABLE);
> > > return z;
> > > }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-11 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-10 16:10 Huaisheng Ye
2018-05-10 16:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-05-11 3:24 ` [External] " Huaisheng HS1 Ye
2018-05-11 13:26 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2018-05-12 11:35 ` Huaisheng HS1 Ye
2018-05-12 14:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-05-16 12:12 ` Huaisheng HS1 Ye
2018-05-18 3:03 ` Huaisheng HS1 Ye
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180511132613.GA30263@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.levin@verizon.com \
--cc=chengnt@lenovo.com \
--cc=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yehs1@lenovo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox