linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	linuxram@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, dave.hansen@intel.com,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, mingo@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	shuah@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 08/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pkey exhaustion test off-by-one
Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 10:13:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180509171350.E1656B95@viggo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180509171336.76636D88@viggo.jf.intel.com>


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

In our "exhaust all pkeys" test, we make sure that there
is the expected number available.  Turns out that the
test did not cover the execute-only key, but discussed
it anyway.  It did *not* discuss the test-allocated
key.

Now that we have a test for the mprotect(PROT_EXEC) case,
this off-by-one issue showed itself.  Correct the off-by-
one and add the explanation for the case we missed.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
---

 b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c |   13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff -puN tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-selftests-exhaust-off-by-one tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c~pkeys-selftests-exhaust-off-by-one	2018-05-09 09:20:21.786698399 -0700
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c	2018-05-09 09:20:21.790698399 -0700
@@ -1148,12 +1148,15 @@ void test_pkey_alloc_exhaust(int *ptr, u
 	pkey_assert(i < NR_PKEYS*2);
 
 	/*
-	 * There are 16 pkeys supported in hardware.  One is taken
-	 * up for the default (0) and another can be taken up by
-	 * an execute-only mapping.  Ensure that we can allocate
-	 * at least 14 (16-2).
+	 * There are 16 pkeys supported in hardware.  Three are
+	 * allocated by the time we get here:
+	 *   1. The default key (0)
+	 *   2. One possibly consumed by an execute-only mapping.
+	 *   3. One allocated by the test code and passed in via
+	 *      'pkey' to this function.
+	 * Ensure that we can allocate at least another 13 (16-3).
 	 */
-	pkey_assert(i >= NR_PKEYS-2);
+	pkey_assert(i >= NR_PKEYS-3);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_allocated_pkeys; i++) {
 		err = sys_pkey_free(allocated_pkeys[i]);
_

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-09 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-09 17:13 [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 01/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Give better unexpected fault error messages Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 02/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Stop using assert() Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 03/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Remove dead debugging code, fix dprint_in_signal Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 04/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Avoid printf-in-signal deadlocks Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 05/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Allow faults on unknown keys Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 06/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Factor out "instruction page" Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 07/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 09/13] x86/pkeys: Override pkey when moving away from PROT_EXEC Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 10/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pointer math Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 11/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Save off 'prot' for allocations Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 12/13] x86/pkeys/selftests: Add a test for pkey 0 Dave Hansen
2018-05-09 17:13 ` [PATCH 13/13] x86/pkeys: Do not special case protection key 0 Dave Hansen
2018-05-14  8:29 ` [PATCH 00/13] [v4] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes Ingo Molnar
2018-05-14  8:47   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-14  8:56   ` [PATCH] x86/pkeys/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the pkeys ABI Ingo Molnar
2018-05-14  8:59   ` [PATCH] x86/mpx/selftests: Adjust the self-test to fresh distros that export the MPX ABI Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180509171350.E1656B95@viggo.jf.intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox