linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Chintan Pandya <cpandya@codeaurora.org>
Cc: vbabka@suse.cz, labbott@redhat.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com, xieyisheng1@huawei.com,
	ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, richard.weiyang@gmail.com,
	byungchul.park@lge.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: vmalloc: Clean up vunmap to avoid pgtable ops twice
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 15:52:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180430155207.35a3dd94c31503c7a6268a8f@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1523876342-10545-1-git-send-email-cpandya@codeaurora.org>

On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:29:02 +0530 Chintan Pandya <cpandya@codeaurora.org> wrote:

> vunmap does page table clear operations twice in the
> case when DEBUG_PAGEALLOC_ENABLE_DEFAULT is enabled.
> 
> So, clean up the code as that is unintended.
> 
> As a perf gain, we save few us. Below ftrace data was
> obtained while doing 1 MB of vmalloc/vfree on ARM64
> based SoC *without* this patch applied. After this
> patch, we can save ~3 us (on 1 extra vunmap_page_range).
> 
>   CPU  DURATION                  FUNCTION CALLS
>   |     |   |                     |   |   |   |
>  6)               |  __vunmap() {
>  6)               |    vmap_debug_free_range() {
>  6)   3.281 us    |      vunmap_page_range();
>  6) + 45.468 us   |    }
>  6)   2.760 us    |    vunmap_page_range();
>  6) ! 505.105 us  |  }

It's been a long time since I looked at the vmap code :(

> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -603,26 +603,6 @@ static void unmap_vmap_area(struct vmap_area *va)
>  	vunmap_page_range(va->va_start, va->va_end);
>  }
>  
> -static void vmap_debug_free_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> -{
> -	/*
> -	 * Unmap page tables and force a TLB flush immediately if pagealloc
> -	 * debugging is enabled.  This catches use after free bugs similarly to
> -	 * those in linear kernel virtual address space after a page has been
> -	 * freed.
> -	 *
> -	 * All the lazy freeing logic is still retained, in order to minimise
> -	 * intrusiveness of this debugging feature.
> -	 *
> -	 * This is going to be *slow* (linear kernel virtual address debugging
> -	 * doesn't do a broadcast TLB flush so it is a lot faster).
> -	 */
> -	if (debug_pagealloc_enabled()) {
> -		vunmap_page_range(start, end);
> -		flush_tlb_kernel_range(start, end);
> -	}
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * lazy_max_pages is the maximum amount of virtual address space we gather up
>   * before attempting to purge with a TLB flush.
> @@ -756,6 +736,9 @@ static void free_unmap_vmap_area(struct vmap_area *va)
>  {
>  	flush_cache_vunmap(va->va_start, va->va_end);
>  	unmap_vmap_area(va);
> +	if (debug_pagealloc_enabled())
> +		flush_tlb_kernel_range(va->va_start, va->va_end);
> +
>  	free_vmap_area_noflush(va);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1142,7 +1125,6 @@ void vm_unmap_ram(const void *mem, unsigned int count)
>  	BUG_ON(!PAGE_ALIGNED(addr));
>  
>  	debug_check_no_locks_freed(mem, size);
> -	vmap_debug_free_range(addr, addr+size);

This appears to be a functional change: if (count <= VMAP_MAX_ALLOC)
and we're in debug mode then the
vunmap_page_range/flush_tlb_kernel_range will no longer be performed. 
Why is this ok?

>  	if (likely(count <= VMAP_MAX_ALLOC)) {
>  		vb_free(mem, size);
> @@ -1499,7 +1481,6 @@ struct vm_struct *remove_vm_area(const void *addr)
>  		va->flags |= VM_LAZY_FREE;
>  		spin_unlock(&vmap_area_lock);
>  
> -		vmap_debug_free_range(va->va_start, va->va_end);
>  		kasan_free_shadow(vm);
>  		free_unmap_vmap_area(va);
>  

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-30 22:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-16 10:59 Chintan Pandya
2018-04-30 22:52 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2018-05-01  6:46   ` Chintan Pandya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180430155207.35a3dd94c31503c7a6268a8f@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cpandya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=xieyisheng1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox