From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f200.google.com (mail-pf0-f200.google.com [209.85.192.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347446B0005 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 04:09:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf0-f200.google.com with SMTP id b16so4262008pfi.5 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 01:09:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q3si4573040pgs.516.2018.04.20.01.09.52 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 20 Apr 2018 01:09:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 10:09:48 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm:memcg: add __GFP_NOWARN in __memcg_schedule_kmem_cache_create Message-ID: <20180420080948.GV17484@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20180418022912.248417-1-minchan@kernel.org> <20180418072002.GN17484@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180418074117.GA210164@rodete-desktop-imager.corp.google.com> <20180418075437.GP17484@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180418132328.GB210164@rodete-desktop-imager.corp.google.com> <20180418132715.GD17484@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180419064005.GL17484@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180420054239.GA221997@rodete-desktop-imager.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180420054239.GA221997@rodete-desktop-imager.corp.google.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Minchan Kim Cc: David Rientjes , Andrew Morton , LKML , linux-mm , Johannes Weiner , Vladimir Davydov On Fri 20-04-18 14:42:39, Minchan Kim wrote: [...] > When I see replies of this thread, it's arguble to add such one-line > warn so if you want it strongly, could you handle by yourself? I do not feel strongly about it to argue as well. So the patch Andrew added with a better explanation is sufficient from my POV. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs