From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: mhocko@kernel.org
Cc: rientjes@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
aarcange@redhat.com, guro@fb.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] mm, oom: fix concurrent munlock and oom reaper unmap
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 20:51:45 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201804192051.JDE35992.OLFOQFMOtJHFSV@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180419110419.GQ17484@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Michal Hocko wrote:
> > We need to teach the OOM reaper stop reaping as soon as entering exit_mmap().
> > Maybe let the OOM reaper poll for progress (e.g. none of get_mm_counter(mm, *)
> > decreased for last 1 second) ?
>
> Can we start simple and build a more elaborate heuristics on top _please_?
> In other words holding the mmap_sem for write for oom victims in
> exit_mmap should handle the problem. We can then enhance this to probe
> for progress or any other clever tricks if we find out that the race
> happens too often and we kill more than necessary.
>
> Let's not repeat the error of trying to be too clever from the beginning
> as we did previously. This are is just too subtle and obviously error
> prone.
>
Something like this?
---
mm/mmap.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
mm/oom_kill.c | 29 +++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index 188f195..3edb7da 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -3015,6 +3015,28 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
/* mm's last user has gone, and its about to be pulled down */
mmu_notifier_release(mm);
+ if (unlikely(mm_is_oom_victim(mm))) {
+ /*
+ * Tell oom_reap_task() not to start reaping this mm.
+ *
+ * oom_reap_task() depends on a stable VM_LOCKED flag to
+ * indicate it should not unmap during munlock_vma_pages_all().
+ *
+ * Since MMF_UNSTABLE is set before calling down_write(),
+ * oom_reap_task() which calls down_read() before testing
+ * MMF_UNSTABLE will not run on this mm after up_write().
+ *
+ * mm_is_oom_victim() cannot be set from under us because
+ * victim->mm is already set to NULL under task_lock before
+ * calling mmput() and victim->signal->oom_mm is set by the oom
+ * killer only if victim->mm is non-NULL while holding
+ * task_lock().
+ */
+ set_bit(MMF_UNSTABLE, &mm->flags);
+ down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ }
+
if (mm->locked_vm) {
vma = mm->mmap;
while (vma) {
@@ -3036,26 +3058,9 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
/* update_hiwater_rss(mm) here? but nobody should be looking */
/* Use -1 here to ensure all VMAs in the mm are unmapped */
unmap_vmas(&tlb, vma, 0, -1);
-
- if (unlikely(mm_is_oom_victim(mm))) {
- /*
- * Wait for oom_reap_task() to stop working on this
- * mm. Because MMF_OOM_SKIP is already set before
- * calling down_read(), oom_reap_task() will not run
- * on this "mm" post up_write().
- *
- * mm_is_oom_victim() cannot be set from under us
- * either because victim->mm is already set to NULL
- * under task_lock before calling mmput and oom_mm is
- * set not NULL by the OOM killer only if victim->mm
- * is found not NULL while holding the task_lock.
- */
- set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags);
- down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
- }
free_pgtables(&tlb, vma, FIRST_USER_ADDRESS, USER_PGTABLES_CEILING);
tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb, 0, -1);
+ set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags);
/*
* Walk the list again, actually closing and freeing it,
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index ff992fa..1fef1b6 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -510,25 +510,16 @@ static bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
/*
* If the mm has invalidate_{start,end}() notifiers that could block,
+ * or if the mm is in exit_mmap() which has unpredictable dependencies,
* sleep to give the oom victim some more time.
* TODO: we really want to get rid of this ugly hack and make sure that
* notifiers cannot block for unbounded amount of time
*/
- if (mm_has_blockable_invalidate_notifiers(mm)) {
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
- schedule_timeout_idle(HZ);
- goto unlock_oom;
- }
-
- /*
- * MMF_OOM_SKIP is set by exit_mmap when the OOM reaper can't
- * work on the mm anymore. The check for MMF_OOM_SKIP must run
- * under mmap_sem for reading because it serializes against the
- * down_write();up_write() cycle in exit_mmap().
- */
- if (test_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags)) {
+ if (mm_has_blockable_invalidate_notifiers(mm) ||
+ test_bit(MMF_UNSTABLE, &mm->flags)) {
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
trace_skip_task_reaping(tsk->pid);
+ schedule_timeout_idle(HZ);
goto unlock_oom;
}
@@ -590,11 +581,9 @@ static void oom_reap_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
while (attempts++ < MAX_OOM_REAP_RETRIES && !__oom_reap_task_mm(tsk, mm))
schedule_timeout_idle(HZ/10);
- if (attempts <= MAX_OOM_REAP_RETRIES ||
- test_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags))
+ if (test_bit(MMF_UNSTABLE, &mm->flags))
goto done;
-
pr_info("oom_reaper: unable to reap pid:%d (%s)\n",
task_pid_nr(tsk), tsk->comm);
debug_show_all_locks();
@@ -603,8 +592,12 @@ static void oom_reap_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
tsk->oom_reaper_list = NULL;
/*
- * Hide this mm from OOM killer because it has been either reaped or
- * somebody can't call up_write(mmap_sem).
+ * Hide this mm from the OOM killer because:
+ * the OOM reaper completed reaping
+ * or
+ * exit_mmap() told the OOM reaper not to start reaping
+ * or
+ * neither exit_mmap() nor the OOM reaper started reaping
*/
set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags);
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-19 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-17 22:46 [patch] " David Rientjes
2018-04-18 0:57 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-04-18 2:39 ` David Rientjes
2018-04-18 2:52 ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes
2018-04-18 3:55 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-04-18 4:11 ` David Rientjes
2018-04-18 4:47 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-04-18 5:20 ` David Rientjes
2018-04-18 7:50 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-18 11:49 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-04-18 11:58 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-18 13:25 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-04-18 13:44 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-18 14:28 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-04-18 19:14 ` David Rientjes
2018-04-19 6:35 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-19 10:45 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-04-19 11:04 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-19 11:51 ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2018-04-19 12:48 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-19 19:14 ` David Rientjes
2018-04-19 19:34 ` David Rientjes
2018-04-19 22:13 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-04-20 8:23 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-20 12:40 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-22 3:22 ` David Rientjes
2018-04-22 3:48 ` [patch v2] mm, oom: fix concurrent munlock and oom reaperunmap Tetsuo Handa
2018-04-22 13:08 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-24 2:31 ` David Rientjes
2018-04-24 5:11 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-04-24 5:35 ` David Rientjes
2018-04-24 21:57 ` [patch v2] mm, oom: fix concurrent munlock and oom reaper unmap Tetsuo Handa
2018-04-24 22:25 ` David Rientjes
2018-04-24 22:34 ` [patch v3 for-4.17] " David Rientjes
2018-04-24 23:19 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-24 13:04 ` [patch v2] mm, oom: fix concurrent munlock and oom reaperunmap Michal Hocko
2018-04-24 20:01 ` David Rientjes
2018-04-24 20:13 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-24 20:22 ` David Rientjes
2018-04-24 20:31 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-24 21:07 ` David Rientjes
2018-04-24 23:08 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-24 23:14 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-22 3:45 ` [patch v2] mm, oom: fix concurrent munlock and oom reaper unmap David Rientjes
2018-04-22 13:18 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-23 16:09 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201804192051.JDE35992.OLFOQFMOtJHFSV@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox