From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f199.google.com (mail-wr0-f199.google.com [209.85.128.199]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FBA86B0007 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:54:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr0-f199.google.com with SMTP id b10so5881300wrf.3 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:54:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de. [213.95.11.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5si1549525wri.252.2018.04.17.12.54.54 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:54:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 21:55:29 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] iommu-common: move to arch/sparc Message-ID: <20180417195529.GA31335@lst.de> References: <20180415145947.1248-1-hch@lst.de> <20180415145947.1248-2-hch@lst.de> <20180416.095833.969403163564136309.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180416.095833.969403163564136309.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: David Miller Cc: khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, hch@lst.de, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 09:58:33AM -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Anshuman Khandual > Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:26:07 +0530 > > > On 04/15/2018 08:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >> This code is only used by sparc, and all new iommu drivers should use the > >> drivers/iommu/ framework. Also remove the unused exports. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > > > Right, these functions are used only from SPARC architecture. Simple > > git grep confirms it as well. Hence it makes sense to move them into > > arch code instead. > > Well, we put these into a common location and used type friendly for > powerpc because we hoped powerpc would convert over to using this > common piece of code as well. > > But nobody did the powerpc work. > > If you look at the powerpc iommu support, it's the same code basically > for entry allocation. I could also introduce a new config symbol and keep it in common code, but it has been there for a while without any new user. Right now it just means we built the code for everyone who selects CONFIG_IOMMU_HELPER, which is just about anyone these days.