From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f198.google.com (mail-pf0-f198.google.com [209.85.192.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9396B0003 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 15:30:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf0-f198.google.com with SMTP id b16so9949629pfi.5 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 12:30:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org. [198.145.29.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h9si8763211pgq.464.2018.04.16.12.30.04 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 12:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 15:30:00 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 015/161] printk: Add console owner and waiter logic to load balance console writes Message-ID: <20180416153000.3fc795b6@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20180416153031.GA5039@amd> <20180416155031.GX2341@sasha-vm> <20180416160608.GA7071@amd> <20180416122019.1c175925@gandalf.local.home> <20180416162757.GB2341@sasha-vm> <20180416163952.GA8740@amd> <20180416164310.GF2341@sasha-vm> <20180416125307.0c4f6f28@gandalf.local.home> <20180416170936.GI2341@sasha-vm> <20180416133321.40a166a4@gandalf.local.home> <20180416174236.GL2341@sasha-vm> <20180416142653.0f017647@gandalf.local.home> <20180416144117.5757ee70@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Sasha Levin , Pavel Machek , Petr Mladek , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Cong Wang , Dave Hansen , Johannes Weiner , Mel Gorman , Michal Hocko , Vlastimil Babka , Peter Zijlstra , Jan Kara , Mathieu Desnoyers , Tetsuo Handa , Byungchul Park , Tejun Heo , Greg KH On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 12:00:08 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:52 AM, Linus Torvalds > > wrote: > > > > > > We're better off making *no* progress, than making "unsteady progress". > > > > > > Really. Seriously. [ me inserted: ] > On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 3:24:29 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > I'm talking about the given example of a simple memory bug that caused > > a very subtle breakage of API, which had another trivial fix that > > should be backported. I'm not sure that's what you were talking about. > > Side note: the original impetus for this was our suspend/resume mess. > It went on for *YEARS*, and it was absolutely chock-full of exactly > this "I fixed the worse problem, and introduced another one". What you are talking about here isn't what I was talking about above ;-) -- Steve