From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl0-f70.google.com (mail-pl0-f70.google.com [209.85.160.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773A16B0012 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 12:22:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pl0-f70.google.com with SMTP id y22-v6so2194987pll.12 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:22:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org. [198.145.29.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z79si11575993pfa.120.2018.04.16.09.22.48 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:22:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 12:22:44 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 015/161] printk: Add console owner and waiter logic to load balance console writes Message-ID: <20180416122244.146aec48@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20180416161412.GZ2341@sasha-vm> References: <20180409001936.162706-1-alexander.levin@microsoft.com> <20180409001936.162706-15-alexander.levin@microsoft.com> <20180409082246.34hgp3ymkfqke3a4@pathway.suse.cz> <20180415144248.GP2341@sasha-vm> <20180416093058.6edca0bb@gandalf.local.home> <20180416153031.GA5039@amd> <20180416155031.GX2341@sasha-vm> <20180416160608.GA7071@amd> <20180416161412.GZ2341@sasha-vm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Sasha Levin Cc: Pavel Machek , Linus Torvalds , Petr Mladek , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Cong Wang , Dave Hansen , Johannes Weiner , Mel Gorman , Michal Hocko , Vlastimil Babka , Peter Zijlstra , Jan Kara , Mathieu Desnoyers , Tetsuo Handa , Byungchul Park , Tejun Heo On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:14:15 +0000 Sasha Levin wrote: > Since the rate we're seeing now with AUTOSEL is similar to what we were > seeing before AUTOSEL, what's the problem it's causing? Does that mean we just doubled the rate of regressions? That's the problem. > > How do you know if a bug bothers someone? > > If a user is annoyed by a LED issue, is he expected to triage the bug, > report it on LKML and patiently wait for the appropriate patch to be > backported? Yes. -- Steve